Monday mania swept under the carpet by indifference and popcorn

[Pinno718]

This appears to duplicate a long established and generally cherished thread elsewhere here

Can I refer the right honourable gentleman of the previous answer I gave to a much similar question only today on this very thread?

 

[classic33]

Can I refer the right honourable gentleman of the previous answer I gave to a much similar question only today on this very thread?

Suppose we said "No"!

 

[Pinno718]

Suppose we said "No"!

But then he will be left uneducated. Are you his legal counsel or something?
Are you wearing one of those silly wigs?

 

[PhotoNic69]

Car finally washed and windows and screen polished with Glaco products thanks to @Pinno718 for making me aware of this amazing stuff. Washed front of house windows too whilst at it. no Glaco this time though tempted.
All done in 2.5 hours and in glorious sun too.
Now for nice cuppa tea.

 

[classic33]

But then he will be ;eft uneducated. Are you his legal counsel or something?
Are you wearing one of those silly wigs?

It might be for the best
And it's "No" and "No".

 

[orraloon]

Suppose we said "No"!

Is these BR immigrunts innit, comin' over 'ere, doing their own thing, setting up their own cliques, not following the roolz etc etc etc

 

[Gwylan]

Can I refer the right honourable gentleman of the previous answer I gave to a much similar question only today on this very thread?

But it wasn't my question. And my question has precedence over any other remotely associated enquiry.

 

[Gwylan]

It might be for the best
And it's "No" and "No".

Do you do pro bono work

 

[Brandane]

Is these BR immigrunts innit, comin' over 'ere, doing their own thing, setting up their own cliques, not following the roolz etc etc etc

Should be put on a flight to YACF if they refuse to blend in to their new surroundings and abide by the established roolz...

 

[Pinno718]

But it wasn't my question. And my question has precedence over any other remotely associated enquiry.

Objection your honour... the right honourable gentleman is incorrect: the other question cannot possibly be described as 'remotely associated'. A cavalier pretext to the question if ever there was one, which if I may, reflects the dubious character of the complainant.
My previous answer is clear and concise which should be more than satisfactory.
Why does this court have to suffer such arduous repetition and superfluous ambiguity?

Oh and I do pro bono. I can represent you against me. Which means I get paid double.

 

[Pinno718]

Should be put on a flight to YACF if they refuse to blend in to their new surroundings and abide by the established roolz...

You won't have to shave my head 'cos i'm bald.
I am the baldy litigator bloke from hell.

 

[classic33]

Is these BR immigrunts innit, comin' over 'ere, doing their own thing, setting up their own cliques, not following the roolz etc etc etc

Well, as one from the previous flight from the same site, I'd say "No"!

 

[briantrumpet]

Do you do pro bono work

Why? Is he in legal jeopardy? So maybe his songs aren't great, but...

 

[oxoman]

Should be put on a flight to YACF if they refuse to blend in to their new surroundings and abide by the established roolz...

YACF is deader than BR.

 

[classic33]

Objection your honour... the right honourable gentleman is incorrect: the other question cannot possibly be described as 'remotely associated'. A cavalier pretext to the question if ever there was one, which if I may, reflects the dubious character of the complainant.
My previous answer is clear and concise which should be more than satisfactory.
Why does this court have to suffer such arduous repetition and superfluous ambiguity?

Oh and I do pro bono. I can represent you against me. Which means I get paid double.

Objection over-ruled.
Even if the previous wasn't in-correct.

There's little dubious about my behavior.