MacB
Lover of things that come in 3's
- Location
- Farnborough, Hampshire
No MacB, he did not have the option to walk away, he has a duty to discharge. His use of personal protective equipment is his to justify. Whether or not it was proportionate is a separate matter. However, you have chosen to swallow the context-free deception that the original posters of the edited version have chosen to sell. That you neither know nor care whether the trike rider was being an arse or getting physical demonstrates that in this instance you are not willing to let the cop even start to justify his use of force.
This is the problem with selective quoting but at least you've tried to flesh out your reasoning more than Pubrunner. I also recognise that my underlying point may not have been clear, so I'll try again:-
as a human being there is the option to walk away - as a policeman following orders that option may not exist - in my book being a human ranks before, and trumps in every respect, being a policeman.
I haven't swallowed any context-free deception, I clearly stated that I really didn't care about the background. We are policed by consent and my consent has never been given to that sort of behaviour whether it's following orders or using personal judgement in deploying 'protective' equipment.
My true problem lies with the fact that I no longer believe the police serve the greater good in the way I, and many others, envision they should. I fully accept that most of the policeman on the frontline try to do their best and stay within the remit as it's laid out to them via the chain of command. But I don't, never have and never will accept 'following orders' as any form of justification for transgressing against another.