Hont
Guru
- Location
- Bromsgrove
I like the one which informed me that Armstong had come back from Cancer lighter and shorter. The lighter I knew about.The comments are good fun!
Well he was one ball short.I like the one which informed me that Armstong had come back from Cancer lighter and shorter. The lighter I knew about.
He won the tours because he was better at cheating than everyone else.Still cannot understand the venom towards Armstrong, yes I know he's a cheat, but no different from a good portion of the bunch at that time, I know he lied and was a complete a#se to anyone who challenged him, but why should he carry the can for everyone else. I dont see people constantly bringing up the misdoings of Pantani, Contador and the like. Lance still won the tours in my eyes, and I'm not a fanboy of lance just of cycling in general.
He won the tours because he was better at cheating than everyone else.
$300,000 apparently. I didn't know about it either but didn't mention it because I thought it was something I'd missed somewhere along the line.That's one of a multitude of reasons.
A new one on me- he tried to pay someone to say Lemond was on drugs
Wouldn't say he was better at cheating as he got caught, but maybe his body reacted to the drugs better. I'm under the opinion that he was, on the day, better than the other riders. His amateur and neo-pro results were very good and it must have been a fairly level playing field at that time in the pro scene.