Do you folk really want a minimalist, purely functional language devoid of all evocation and imagery?
how else would you convey the concept of recognising that there are multiple dimensions to the factors that affect what you are trying to do, each factor has a constraint, whichever way you try to achieve your objective you run into one or more of those constraints, and rather than just accept that you are going to see if you can exceed any of those constraints, but not to the extent that you totally break the whole system?
Let's place this on the back burner.
Are all invocations of images from different areas of life to be banned? Personally when I hear hit the ground running I always think of the scene in Blues Brothers where the soldiers jump out of the personnel carrier and haven't got a clue which way to go...
Four syllables. As opposed to, say, it could have the potential to be an idea that makes more than just incremental progress, which is boringly mundane as well as six times as long...
Let's seek the views of our stakeholders and key stakeholders.
There's been a bit of a transformation in business and government circles over recent decades from seeing the public as passive recipients not deserving any say in what happens, to people who legitimately have a role in influencing outcomes, and if language can contribute to that, three cheers say I.
Don't you folk read poetry?
