rich p said:
An electric kettle for me but I seem to remember hearing that it takes as much electricity to boil a kettle as that to power your electric lights for a whole evening. No stats on that though.
Applying a little back-of-the-envelope science here...
My office kettle is rated at 2 kilowatts. That's 2000 watts. It takes about a minute to boil a cupful of water.
A minute is 1/60 of an hour, so I make that 1/60 hour * 2 kw = 0.033 Kilowatt-hours.
If I run the lights in my livingroom from when I get home (about 6pm) to when I go to bed (about 10pm), that'd be three forty-watt bulbs at one end of the room and one hundred-watt bulb at the other*, making a total of 220 watts (or 0.22kw) for 4 hours.
That makes 4 hours * 0.22 kw = 0.88 kilowatt-hours.
So my lights use about 26 times the amount of power that my kettle does.
If I had fluorescent bulbs in the living room, that'd be about 15 watts at each end of the room, so 4 hours * 0.03 kilowatts = 0.12 kilowatt-hours - still more than three times the power used by the kettle.
But if I filled the kettle, it'd need about three minutes to boil, and then the energy consumption would approach that used by the lights. And if I were wasteful and left lights on all over the house...
* The living room lights have dimmers, and so won't work with low-energy bulbs. One day, we'll sort this out. Having looked at these sums, it probably ought to be sooner rather than later. The low-energy bulbs would save about 0.75 kwH a day. It wouldn't take that long to recoup the cost of some bulbs and new switches... Hmmm...