Having to wear a helmet to do a sportive

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

screenman

Legendary Member
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow.

I spent a hour training in the forest just outside my back garden this afternoon, got whacked clean across the forehead by a branch that came down in the wind, I was pleased I had my helmet on.

I think the banning of handguns in the UK was supposed to be an alternative to bullet proof vests.
 
Mighty oaks from little acorns grow.

I spent a hour training in the forest just outside my back garden this afternoon, got whacked clean across the forehead by a branch that came down in the wind, I was pleased I had my helmet on.

I think the banning of handguns in the UK was supposed to be an alternative to bullet proof vests.

Yep - ban bikes?
 

jimboalee

New Member
Location
Solihull
I took a ride along the canal tow path earlier in the summer. I fell in. Luckily, my polystyrene helmet kept my head above the surface and I didn't sink to the mirky bottom.

I will always wear my helmet. :tongue:
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
[QUOTE 1170160"]
I've said it before and I'll say it again:

HELMETS SAVE LIVES
[/quote]


:biggrin: Nice try Lee but I don't think that will convince the doubters! :biggrin:
 

jimboalee

New Member
Location
Solihull
The best thing to do with cycle helmets is to cut the straps off.
Then you get all the benefits of thermal insulation and sun shading; and when you take a tumble, the helmet flies off out of harm's way and your head is as safe as houses.
 

PpPete

Legendary Member
Location
Chandler's Ford
Anyway thats me done with this subject I will always wear one makes me feel abit safer,It was a good comment from screenman,Sorry dident know fabio hit mainly his face.Anyway good debate one which no one can win due to points of view been different (VERY).Happy and safe bike riding everybody with or without that helmet. P.s just a note to porkypete sorry about the spelling.

That's alright .... I'm a spelling Nazi not a helmet Nazi
 
[QUOTE 1170160"]
I've said it before and I'll say it again:

HELMETS SAVE LIVES
[/quote]
Be interesting to see the evidence for that statement.

Up to a decade ago few professionals wore helmets, two decades ago none did. So for over 100 years these guys were racing around two hundred days a year with no head protection, and anyone whose crash count for the year was only in single figures would be considered remarkable lucky. They have just the sort of accidents helmets are said to prevent, falls from the bike involving no motor vehicle collision with a heavy impact on the ground. Now if helmets were a nescessary safety item you would expect the number of deaths and serious head injuries among pro cyclists to have reduced dramatically during the past decade - except that it hasn't, and it hasn't because there was nothing that was there to be reduced. Cycling has always been a sport where fatalities are so rare as to be remarkable, and those very few that did occur were almost always for reasons other than a head injury.

The same goes for amateur racing, people have been killed virtually every season during the four decades I have been involved in the sport but always after being hit by a vehicle, not even one that I can remember from just a fall. The same goes for all the club runs, chain gangs, group rides etc that I have gone on. Loads of crashes, everyone walked away. Yet to hear some of the helmet evangelists you would think that anyone who rode round the block without a helmet on was taking the same risk as someone playing Russian Roulette with 4 rounds in the chamber.

Feel free to challange the above if you can find statistics to disprove what I have written above, but if you can you will be doing well because no one else ever has dispite rigorous reserch from the compulsion lobby.

So, wear a helmet if you like, no-one will laugh, but when you see someone riding without one mind your own bloody business.
 
Are you saying that a helmet has absolutely no use at all in head protection?
I'm saying it makes so little difference that I wouldn't even consider one. There will always be a particular set of circumstances where a helmet will help prevent injury, but those instances are so few as to be statistically insignificant.

Wear one if you want, freedom of choice is a great thing but please respect mine too.
 
Before i start this IS NOT another you should/should not wear a helmet ( enough of them threads already
rolleyes.gif
)

I have been cycling longer and longer distances on my own which i enjoy but i would like to take it a stage further.
I think i'm ready now to do a sportive or two and have made a few enquiries and it looks like i'll have to wear a helmet to take part. Now i don't wear a helmet and have no intention to either. I can't even sign a disclaimer apparently, bloody health and safety. So is that it then, either wear a helmet or don't do sportives?

jay

LOL..But it looks like its heading for another long winded helmet thread, each to there own I say, on my part, and looking at my helmet after my tumble the other week saved some damage to my head, but it did not save me knocking out some front teeth, one buggered arm and two broken ribs. but the Bike was ok:-)
 

PpPete

Legendary Member
Location
Chandler's Ford
Well said Joe.... despite your spelling error!

Baffles me why the CTC, BC (or some other suitable body) cannot fund the TRL to do some proper independent research. Everything I've read seems to be "loaded" with a prior agenda.
 

snorri

Legendary Member
Baffles me why the CTC, BC (or some other suitable body) cannot fund the TRL to do some proper independent research. Everything I've read seems to be "loaded" with a prior agenda.
I don't think more research would tell us very much, helmets offer some protection against certain head injuries, but may present risk of other types of injury.
The risks involved in cycling are very much up to the individual cyclist. From the lone cyclist who travels a half a mile at slow speed on a traffic free path to collect his daily newspaper to the competitive type who speeds down a rock strewn mountain track through a forest and eager to beat the other guy by a split second.
It would be sad if precautions deemed important for one class of user were applied across all cycle users, and indeed it is difficult to understand why so many individuals seem to think this should be the case.
 

screenman

Legendary Member
Here is a test you could try yourself, press your head hard against a normal road surface, keeping it pressed there walk along at say 5mph for 10 feet, now try doing the same with an helmet on. Now I know this test is not scientific and I am not wanting to be the person that does it.

Can I ask just as a matter of interest of course, does anyone who does not wear a helmet do the lottery?

I must say that I am all for freedom of choice and I wear a helmet.
 
Here is a test you could try yourself, press your head hard against a normal road surface, keeping it pressed there walk along at say 5mph for 10 feet, now try doing the same with an helmet on. Now I know this test is not scientific and I am not wanting to be the person that does it.

Can I ask just as a matter of interest of course, does anyone who does not wear a helmet do the lottery?

I must say that I am all for freedom of choice and I wear a helmet.
Not only is it not scientific, it's laughable bollox.
 
Top Bottom