Smokin Joe said:
I can't believe that cyclists are dismissing F1 because of the influence the car has on the outcome. How many Tour de France winners suceeded without the aid of a little engine developed in a laboritory somewhere?
And an expensive one at that, unaffordable to the average guy in the bunch.
The point is though that the cyclist has to power his bike which means it's fair to regard him as a sportsman. The car does the work in F1 even though the driver has to be fit to cope with it, same as show jumping where the horse does the work.
Somebody mentioned darts players earlier but they are more sportsmen than F1 drivers because they have to provide the power to chuck the darts even though the average darts player is probably about 0.001 X as fit as a F1 driver.
And yes we all know that pro cycling is as bent as a donkey's hind leg but the fact is that the nature of the activity still makes it a sport whereas F1 doesn't. FWIW there are some other "sports" which aren't e.g. I reckon clay pigeon shooting is a skill rather than a sport whereas archery would count as a sport.
And finally I don't think anyone would want to detract from Hamilton's achievement. Splendid stuff it is but sport it ain't.