Can you be available at the bottom of a hill tomorrow morning for an experiment? Only we need a ginger cat.
I'm allergic to cats, can't you get the badger from the other thread ?
Can you be available at the bottom of a hill tomorrow morning for an experiment? Only we need a ginger cat.
I was going to say maybe one to many bangs on the head without wearing a helmet
I'm allergic to cats, can't you get the badger from the other thread ?
No bangs on my head - my fringe receded years ago
Come on ...... your picture, FELIXstowe.....don't try pretending.
That is actually my daughter's stuffed toy. If the photo was taken from the rear you would note the "LEGOLAND" logo across its backside. (The stuffed cat toy and not my daughter before anyone phone's Childline...)
Legoland do taxidermy?
Do people on this forum broadly agree that wearing helmets on a motorbike is safer than no helmet? Just trying to understand the issues here...
arrrhh, i may know the answer here, i think its more dangerous to wear a helmet than not, if you wear a helmet you know you have one on and therefore drive at 300mph round corners and die. if you dont wear one you know you can die so ride at 30mph very safely
No because the reported evidence suggests that a crash at 30mp with or without a helmet will have the same outcome.
But you will either die or not die regardless. Statistics tell us so. We are in a quantum "cat in a box" state until we crashnot strictly true, if you wear a £30 helmet and crash at 30mph you will have wasted £30. If you dont wear a helmet and crash at 30mph you also smash your head and die but youve saved £30, whos laughing now angelfish, whos laughing now
But you will either die or not die regardless. Statistics tell us so. We are in a quantum "cat in a box" state until we crash
we cannot get another you, but we can buy another helmet and cat
What's not to like!?