Is that verifiable?
Pops up in this thread http://velorooms.com/index.php?topic=2718.msg111588#msg111588 and on twitter. Would be a more tedious task to make it all up.
Is that verifiable?
i am unmoved by this... it was so long ago, really a different era. the following year was what mattered, attitudes had changed (slightly) and that is why the pharmstrong case was important - USPS reignited the arms race for drugs - the two speed peloton took shape.
i still don't get why the witch-hunt is for cycling? i don't see any other sport having to go through this.
It was so long ago that O'Grady retired the day before the results were announced, Laurence!i am unmoved by this... it was so long ago, really a different era. the following year was what mattered, attitudes had changed (slightly) and that is why the pharmstrong case was important - USPS reignited the arms race for drugs - the two speed peloton took shape.
i still don't get why the witch-hunt is for cycling? i don't see any other sport having to go through this.
Jens will have been tested a fair few times, he's clean as a whistle.
It was so long ago that O'Grady retired the day before the results were announced, Laurence!
There are a fair few still involved in cycling including some DSs.
Bloody good point.two 100m runners have just failed drugs tests, will there be a retest of 1998 samples in athletics?
This wasn't a retest with a view to taking retribution - the senate's motives were different which you may or may not agree with but the investigation wasn't undertaken by the UCI, WADA etc.and? i don't get the argument that if they took drugs back then then they shouldn't have any further involvement in the sport.
it was another time, in many ways. O'Grady has kept going since then, he is better placed than many to have a DS role.
i'm all for cleaning up the sport, but the constant hand wringing of the past has to stop. two 100m runners have just failed drugs tests, will there be a retest of 1998 samples in athletics?
Pops up in this thread http://velorooms.com/index.php?topic=2718.msg111588#msg111588 and on twitter. Would be a more tedious task to make it all up.
I wasn't suggesting you made it up (that would be silly!), just wondering where the info came from. Thanks for the link.
It's just a table of the information in the report; pretty easy to confirm.