Compared with some of the places it's completely legal to cycle that looks remarkably safe. The danger comes because drivers expect the hard shoulder to be completely clear.
I remember seeing a group of 3 cycle tourists on the A3 north of Guildford in rush hour, and a few years ago we drove north on the A1, passing at least 3 individual cyclists, including one carrying a very large rucksack.
Both roads are motorways without the designation and without the wide hard shoulder.
I saw someone the other week cycling on the hard shoulder of the M1 heading southbound between the services and the M69 junction, I thought maybe he works at the services and does the journey twice a day. Certainly a lot more direct (at least one of the ways) than if you went by car.
Caption Comp anyone
Man cycles on M1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-24518094
I've seen the bridge patrol collecting someone half-way up the QE2 bridge, which is quite a climb.
I certainly would not.And? I regularly cycle on the A14.
The police on the scene used their discretion, and long may it continueBut why let him off? It's just more ammo for the anti-cycling brigade if he can blatantly disregard the laws and get away with it. He needs a serious kick in the slats!
Crossing control operates an escort for cyclists. Some of their vehicles have bike racks to ferry people and their bikes across, not sure if you have to pay for this servicePedant mode I know but the Dartford Bridge is not Motorway. Between Junctions 31 and 2 it's the A282.
So it's only lorry drivers who get confused then? A car has never hit another car on the hard shoulder?
2713042 said:I have done the M23 spur from Gatwick. Only as far as the Balcombe road though. The signage could be better because the proper route is far fromobvious.The road I should be actualy using