Fair point . In not averse to upsetting motorists perse , ie - with good cause - if the only way to hold a sportive and be able to reasonably assure the safety of cyclists (and motorists) would be to close the road for a short while then i would wiegh up all the pros and cons and make an informed decision. May be feasible subject to alternative routes for traffic, particularly on a road like bodmin that im guessing if closed for a couple of hours isnt going to bring the country any closer to economic collapse than it allready is.
(I am averse to upsetting motoristsnunecessarily just for some misguided militany cycling ideology)
Thinking about it if these sportives are 100 miles long then that would mean closing alot of roads so if might not be feasible unless it is a circuitous route like round bodmin moor.
You really have no idea, do you?
Closing roads for a Sportive
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eeb6/9eeb659edbc3005443c2204dafe32f68bfa7bffb" alt="Laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
just try to visualize the costs involved. Even Fred Whitton, arguably the best placed sportive for road closures (due to it's popularity, and dangerous nature of some of the descents) has failed to make any inroads into that particular area.
Most actual races are held on open roads, closing roads in the UK is a major, major undertaking. Surrey Classic this year is a great example of what we're talking about. Thousands of people involved.
Obviously sportives aren't races, but a lot of participants treat them thus, and the standard of riding is often shocking. I guarantee any Sunday group ride is far far better behaved and organised than pretty much any sportive. Should sportives be banned? Absolutely not.
Should you get out more, and maybe sample that cornerstone of British cycling, the Sunday club ride, before casting stones? Absolutely yes.