That wasnt really what I was getting at. I was wondering if motorists would have more sympathy with cyclists if they had to get on a bike and see what it was like for themselves as well as vice versa.
For example I tow a large trailer quite a lot and you would be amazed how many people will pull into the gap in between my vehicle and the one in front of me as I approach a junction or a line of stationary traffic. Although it may seem that I am leaving quite a large gap, I need this space as my stopping distance is much increased due to the added weight and once or twice I have had to work quite hard to prevent myself running into the back of them. Also when moving out to the centre of the road, left indicator on to negotiate a tight corner has lead to some bright sparks deciding to try and pass me on the inside leaving us both stationary with nowhere to go.
I am sure that all road users have their own difficulties peculiar to their own mode of transport that might be quite so apparent to others.
I do not think myself a particularly skilled driver, cyclist or motorcyclist. But I am in no doubt that my skill and awareness in each of the three pursuits would be even poorer without the many thousands of miles I've spent enjoying the other two.
I've never towed a trailer, but I bet I'd be more considerate towards towing vehicles if I had.
As to the lovely cars question:
Is anything more effortlessly stylish than a Chapron DS?
Is anything more alluringly, pointlessly, weirdly jolie-laide than the prototypical blind alley that was the Citroen M35?
Is anything cuter than a early Fiat 850 Spyder (the model with faired-in lights)?
Is any modern-era supercar more subtle than a 288 GTO?
Has there ever been anything as lovely as the Bimota DB1, even though it isn't a car?
Was anything so resolutely unfussy ever as pretty as a Lancia Aurelia B20?
The correct answer to each of the above is "Of course not!"
Each of the above, if a bicycle, would be a very nice one indeed. Maybe not the M35....