Doping git thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Location
Midlands
So 7 tests does not seem to me to be a rigorous approach was taken towards targeting her.

Yup - I agree - however the funding the anti-doping agencies get from the national federations in comparison with the problem does not allow for more rigorous testing - although some would say that more than once a month - twice a month including competition testing borders on "rigorous" compared to testing carried out in other sports
 
OP
OP
rich p

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
I'm not sure if any information is available regarding whether she was subject to "additional" testing.

I realise the following is based on assumption and limited information, however if we take the tweet from her father yesterday, stating she had been tested 16 times this year, then possibly not; in 2016 she has won 5 one-day races, a stage of The Women's Tour and wore the leaders jersey in The Women's Tour for 3 days (one being the same day she won the stage), so that's 8 times I would expect her to have been tested; which leaves another 8 tests, one of which we know she had the day after her first missed test. So 7 tests does not seem to me to be a rigorous approach was taken towards targeting her.

Early morning, only one coffee consumed musing...

If that's the case then she was extremely unlucky to have the family crisis at the exact time of the random test.
Three conclusions.
A huge unfortunate coincidence
She actually was unavailable for testing on a lot more occasions but wasn't tested
Or something more sinister
 

SWSteve

Guru
Location
Bristol...ish
is this a fair timeline for the first missed test:

Feb 15 - BC send all athletes, including LA, an email instructing to put room numbers where possible on the whereabouts form.
Aug 15 - LA misses a test because she was asleep during her allocated hour, which she chose, and decided to not tell the hotel to be informed of testers arrived, and also didn't put a room number on the whereabouts form.
Aug 16 - BC defend this missed test, stating there was nothing extra that could have been done, and the tester should have tried harder to contact her?
 
I'm not sure if any information is available regarding whether she was subject to "additional" testing.

I realise the following is based on assumption and limited information, however if we take the tweet from her father yesterday, stating she had been tested 16 times this year, then possibly not; in 2016 she has won 5 one-day races, a stage of The Women's Tour and wore the leaders jersey in The Women's Tour for 3 days (one being the same day she won the stage), so that's 8 times I would expect her to have been tested; which leaves another 8 tests, one of which we know she had the day after her first missed test. So 7 tests does not seem to me to be a rigorous approach was taken towards targeting her.

Early morning, only one coffee consumed musing...
And she was tested 2 days ago, so that's another test accounted for:
"I’m one of the most tested athletes in the world*,’ she said. ‘I’ve been tested at least 16 times this year. I was tested two days ago."
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/armitstead-i-am-a-clean-athlete-and-an-honest-person/

*Did she really say this? :laugh:
 

SWSteve

Guru
Location
Bristol...ish

Buddfox

Veteran
Location
London
If that's the case then she was extremely unlucky to have the family crisis at the exact time of the random test.
Three conclusions.
A huge unfortunate coincidence
She actually was unavailable for testing on a lot more occasions but wasn't tested
Or something more sinister

It feels mean-spirited to say it, but I wouldn't be surprised if the family emergency (whilst not fabricated) has been used as a desperation excuse as it occurred at in and around the timing of the third test. You miss the third test, you realise what might happen, you panic, it just so happens that someone in your family has been taken ill or had an accident (or perhaps even worse) and you are then able to use it as a justification.

In my heart of hearts, I still don't think she doped, but I'm sad we're discussing it about a British cyclist.
 
Location
Midlands
but I'm sad we're discussing it about a British cyclist.

She missed three tests - if she had only missed two we wouldn't be discussing it - in fact we wern't - I saw somewhere that that there were another 36 athletes that had missed tests - what the real number is we don't know - in view of the number of people who get tested I suspect that it is rather more than that - If we take LA's explanations at face value - the circumstance conspired against her - life is like that
 

PaulB

Legendary Member
Location
Colne
Talking of Rio, wasn't he banned for eight months for missing ONE test?
 

DogTired

Über Member

oldroadman

Veteran
Location
Ubique
|Well despite all the opinions of people (like me) who don't know the full facts, CAS has reviewed the case and made a decision. They are not any old people, they are all legals and know the rules of evidence. So the decision stands. One thing was interesting, the tester is constantly referred to as "he". Now as anyone who has any experience of the process will know, sampling from females has to be done by a female. To put it delicately, to ensure that the sample comes from the right place and embarrassment is minimum. So was there a male tester doing the paperwork element of the job, and if so did they have a female medic along to actually oversee the sample being produced? No-one knows, which is my point above. Plenty of uninformed opinion but no substance. My guess could be that 99% of posters have little or no idea of what actually happens unless they are testers or have been tested.
But let's not that get in the way of trial by internet.
 
Top Bottom