BentMikey said:I think you've completely missed the point, crackle. Sure, both are anecdotal, that's not in contention. The point is that your incident proves nothing about helmets either way, and neither would a helmeted crash, though both are often used to "prove" that helmets do protect. Ravenbait's proves that helmets can sometimes injure. It's not biased, it's simply fact.
I think you have too but look! We ain't going to reach any consensus on this and I'm done here I think, unless someone picks on one of my posts. So let's part friends and agree to disagree. We can have another 'right old discussion' when a new study comes out. Until then........adios on the helmet thread.
...and well done Handsome Joe. 38 posts in he must be wondering what the hell he's joined up to
