Angelfishsolo
A Velocipedian
- Location
- Cwmbach, South Wales
By definition a helmet that meets the BS standard is implicitly making that claim.Does that mean you can't find a helmet company making the claims, and do owe me a pint?
By definition a helmet that meets the BS standard is implicitly making that claim.Does that mean you can't find a helmet company making the claims, and do owe me a pint?
Having read their disclaimer, best of luck trying to sue.You miss the point. The question was "if the car fails to protect you in the way it should based on NCAP rating". So do you sue NCAP for giving the car an incorrect rating or BMW for building a dud?
If you bang your head against a brick wall and it doesn't hurt you may have some underlying medical condition, or you may just be to drunk. plus what sort of deity would stop you banging your head but would let you get squished helmet and all by a cement truck?.
I think they could possibly have a small protective effect in some very limited situations - basically a stationary fall onto the head.
The risk of this happening is the same or lower as a pedestrian - absolutely tiny.
They are of absolutely no use at higher energy collisions.
So they are not worth wearing, for all of the negative effects we have already gone though.
"The most marked decrease in injuries occurred before mandatory helmet wearing was introduced in 1991.
Subsequent reductions in head injuries have occurred at a much lower rate and are not of the magnitude you'd expect from making all cyclists wear a helmet.’’
"The findings suggested the greatest reductions in head injuries resulting from cycling accidents came from improved road safety measures introduced before 1991 including lower speed limits, random breath testing and advertising"
By definition a helmet that meets the BS standard is implicitly making that claim.
Haven't given it a moment of my time. Am not interested in the slightest TBH.No luck finding a helmet claim then?
Haven't given it a moment of my time. Am not interested in the slightest TBH.
Whatever you want to believe. It can only be belief as you have no proofInterested enough to argue for some long time but not interested enough to continue when the going gets difficult eh?
Haven't given it a moment of my time. Am not interested in the slightest TBH.
Whatever you want to believe. It can only be belief as you have no proof
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. However you already know that. You must be desperate for a drink.I'll have a pint of SA then please!
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. However you already know that. You must be desperate for a drink.
A bet has to be accepted but then you know that as well don't you.Hey the bet was that you couldn't find the claim, it's not my fault you couldn't be bothered to try !
A bet has to be accepted but then you know that as well don't you.
Whatever turns you on old boy.No problem, I will buy my own pint, if you want the live with the eternal , crushing shame of welching , far be it from me to remind you, tomorrow, and the day after tomorrow, next week , month year d,ecade...