CTC capitulation?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

jonesy

Guru
Find us a single example of a UK roundabout with raised lane separators and continental geometry and you'll have a case that the Bedford design isn't new in the UK.
 

jonesy

Guru
Shame User didn't stumble across something quite so useful.
 

Pete Owens

Well-Known Member
It seems MAG, Motorcycle Action Group, has been campaigning in opposition to this scheme, on the grounds that the raised kerb lane dividers are dangerous for motorcycles and cyclists,

http://www.mag-uk.org/en/newsdetail/a7169

When a scheme is designed to improve the safety of vulnerable road users by forcing motor vehicles to slow down then the opposition of motorised road users is only to be expected. Indeed, I consider it a key test of whether a scheme is worthwhile that it generates howls of anguish from motorists. Now they cannot openly admit that their real reason for objection is that the design is that it will slow them down by preventing them taking a racing line through the junction (ie that it will work as intended) so they dress it up as a concern for safety - just as the anti-speed-camera brigade pretend to be safety organisations.
 

stowie

Legendary Member
When a scheme is designed to improve the safety of vulnerable road users by forcing motor vehicles to slow down then the opposition of motorised road users is only to be expected. Indeed, I consider it a key test of whether a scheme is worthwhile that it generates howls of anguish from motorists. Now they cannot openly admit that their real reason for objection is that the design is that it will slow them down by preventing them taking a racing line through the junction (ie that it will work as intended) so they dress it up as a concern for safety - just as the anti-speed-camera brigade pretend to be safety organisations.

Possibly. What happens on turbo roundabouts in Holland? Do they use the same plastic dividers and do they have an accident issue with PTW?

Maybe you should present to them the option of taking out one lane from the roundabout as cycle provision and then there won't be any dividers for PTW or any other motor traffic. Very clear where drivers should be. ^_^
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
When a scheme is designed to improve the safety of vulnerable road users by forcing motor vehicles to slow down then the opposition of motorised road users is only to be expected. Indeed, I consider it a key test of whether a scheme is worthwhile that it generates howls of anguish from motorists. Now they cannot openly admit that their real reason for objection is that the design is that it will slow them down by preventing them taking a racing line through the junction (ie that it will work as intended) so they dress it up as a concern for safety - just as the anti-speed-camera brigade pretend to be safety organisations.
no, it means that they're fearful that people will hit a low barrier and get hurt. And, my experience of the neo-turbo roundabout outside Chichester is that they have a point.
 

Pete Owens

Well-Known Member
no, it means that they're fearful that people will hit a low barrier and get hurt. And, my experience of the neo-turbo roundabout outside Chichester is that they have a point.
And since viritually all urban roads come equipped with low barriers on either side (including the existing layout) it is rather a coincidence to that they suddenly develelp a kerb-phobia for this particular scheme.
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
And since viritually all urban roads come equipped with low barriers on either side (including the existing layout) it is rather a coincidence to that they suddenly develelp a kerb-phobia for this particular scheme.
kerbs where you expect them to be are one thing. Kerbs strewn hither, thither and yon.....not so good. My point is this - it ill behoves us to be cynical about people that have as much to lose of gain in terms of risk as we do.

Oh - and can we get past the 'vulnerable road user' stuff? Especially when we're discussing a bit of engineering that looks like it's set up to inconvenience pedestrians.
 

Pete Owens

Well-Known Member
Especially when we're discussing a bit of engineering that looks like it's set up to inconvenience pedestrians.
Yes indeed - those direct zebra crossings across all the arms of the junction (made possible by the reduced design speed of the roundabout) will be a real bind for anyone trying to cross the road on foot.
 
Last edited:

stowie

Legendary Member
I would have thought the only positive thing to come out of this scheme is that pedestrians now have a method of crossing the road with some priority via the crossings as opposed to the existing scheme where they have to cross by darting inbetween traffic. The crossing points look like they are pretty much in exactly the same place and not a million miles off the desire lines. I am a bit confused as to how this scheme has made life worse for pedestrians - what else should be implemented (bearing in mind the all important caveat of "traffic flow")? I consider zebra crossings hugely superior to pelican crossings and would think that pedestrians would be inconvenienced more even in a crossroad situation where they had to wait for the green phase.
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
it's about the distance people have to walk. Make it a crossroads, stick some traffic lights in, and put right-angle and diagonal crossings with a pedestrian only phase and you've got yourself a place rather than a diagram that people have to navigate around. (And, yes, we've had them for years in London). And, in the Bedford instance, you could have a bit more planting in the land you reclaim from roadway.
 

jonesy

Guru
it's about the distance people have to walk. Make it a crossroads, stick some traffic lights in, and put right-angle and diagonal crossings with a pedestrian only phase and you've got yourself a place rather than a diagram that people have to navigate around. (And, yes, we've had them for years in London). And, in the Bedford instance, you could have a bit more planting in the land you reclaim from roadway.

Yes, there is an argument that replacing it with a signalised junction would be better for vulnerable road users. But that doesn't make Pete Owens wrong in pointing out that providing zebra crossings is an improvement on what there is at the moment. Getting an improved roundabout is surely better than asking for a signalised crossing and getting no change at all?
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
Yes, there is an argument that replacing it with a signalised junction would be better for vulnerable road users. But that doesn't make Pete Owens wrong in pointing out that providing zebra crossings is an improvement on what there is at the moment. Getting an improved roundabout is surely better than asking for a signalised crossing and getting no change at all?
asking and spending twenty million quid on an ideological totem are two very different things.

Let's be clear about this - the roundabout in Bedford has nothing to do with anything other than the kind of instrumental thought that holds conceptualising dear. Somebody decided this was a good idea, and they decided on the basis of a conceptualised model of movement that has diddlysquit to do with placemaking and everything to do with a cast of mind. And, actually, it's not a very nice cast of mind.

And here............is a place at which people gather, recognise each other and feel like they belong.
balham_zps58fce0f2.png
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
asking and spending twenty million quid on an ideological totem are two very different things.

Let's be clear about this - the roundabout in Bedford has nothing to do with anything other than the kind of instrumental thought that holds conceptualising dear. Somebody decided this was a good idea, and they decided on the basis of a conceptualised model of movement that has diddlysquit to do with placemaking and everything to do with a cast of mind. And, actually, it's not a very nice cast of mind.

And here............is a place at which people gather, recognise each other and feel like they belong.
balham_zps58fce0f2.png
Hmm, it looks a bit like the primary reason people are gathering together is because they're all waiting to cross the road.
 
Top Bottom