It is the best. But as presentations of statistics go it's terrible.
You have a time series of data. You have been preparing to release this time series for the last nine months. It's the most important data you will release all year so that the country has confidence in your ability to protect them. It's really important to know trends in the data. Do you:
(a) Release the data each day as a list, showing daily incremental and cumulative data points, by date of dose and date of reporting so that it's absolutely clear how many doses have been given when to whom? or
(b) Release the data ad-hoc, showing only data to date, with no breakdown of reporting date or vaccination date, with inconsistencies between different data dumps?
Direct link to the actual document rather than the government PR machine's spin on the document:
https://assets.publishing.service.g...951284/UK_COVID-19_vaccines_delivery_plan.pdf
Likewise the rollout of this vaccine is the most important and development in public health in a decade. Getting it right is essential, and gaining public confidence that you know what you're doing is even more important. Your efforts to date have not met the targets you have set and have been met by the public with some scepticism. Do you:
(a) Release the rollout plan in advance of starting the vaccination programme, making it short, accessible, factual and with clear measurable targets that are convincing and clearly stated? or
(b) Release the rollout plan a month after the rollout started, making it long, wordy, full of jargon, stuffed full of irrelevant callout sections on how wonderful and - yes "world-leading" (twice) your country's response has been, including quotes from "Major Button" and someone unidentified saying "So well organised"?
Buried somewhere within that 47-page report there is the 10-page plan it was before the ministers got at it.