Yes, I did wonder if she was just "making smoke" to cover up incompetence but thought there might be another explanation.I think she is blaming anyone but herself and the EU procurement process.
Can somebody explain (or post a link to an explanation) why Ursula von der Leyden is getting shirty about vaccine availability? Isn't it a contractual issue with AZ rather than the UK government?
Hmmmm. So on the principle of "a level playing field" and " reciprocity" the idea is to hobble the UK's vaccination programme as well????The UK recognised that Civil Service procedural bureaucracy was not best suited to fleet of foot procurement, contract negotiation and financing in an uncertain, dynamic and everchanging pandemic response and co-opted Private Sector expertise and experience in those plus a biomedical finance expert to lead the process. They got the job done.
Von der Leyden gave the job to the existing EU beureacracy. They farked up. She is embarrassed.
Hmmmm. So on the principle of "a level playing field" and " reciprocity" the idea is to hobble the UK's vaccination programme as well????
Early doors, a few million Oxford-AZ vaccines were manufactured in Belgium and exported to the UK - this was before the EU EMA authorised the use of Ox-AZ vaccine (?29 Jan). All the UK's Pfizer vaccine supply comes from Europe but some of the vaccines' constituents come from UK (Snaith, Yorkshire).Can somebody explain (or post a link to an explanation) why Ursula von der Leyden is getting shirty about vaccine availability? Isn't it a contractual issue with AZ rather than the UK government?
Can somebody explain (or post a link to an explanation) why Ursula von der Leyden is getting shirty about vaccine availability? Isn't it a contractual issue with AZ rather than the UK government?
That is the UK press interpretation but there is little evidence that AZ wouldn't have shortfalled the EU even if it had signed up on its current terms before the UK. The EU-AZ contract does not seem to be what the EU wants. It would be interesting to see the UK-AZ contract wording.Someone will come along with a more technical explanation but as the EU have less than expected they think they should get some of the UK supply. They haven't got any and hold both AZ and the UK to blame for this. When infact the teal culprit was slow procurement by the EU.
As long as that doesn't include large group rides outside, as you proclaim that safe. Or something.
Such hypocrisy. Follow the guidance, or don't. But don't pretend you know better.
In the EU the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine makes up the vast majority of delivered doses to date: about three quarters; and 7% Moderna. The rest is Oxford-AZ. About 10% have had a first jab and of those 4% have had both: perhaps 78M doses in all.With AZ delivering only 35ish% of the order, the EU is very reliant on Pfizer and Moderna at the moment
Although in other news MPs call for the right to protest. If that happens I will no longer be able to understand why I need to follow rules re number in a group cycling together and my inclination to comply with the rules will be much reduced. Maybe if in a large cycling group could just say we are protesting about the right to protest.
I think you mean "ensure that all Europeans at serious risk of death are protected, whether they live in the EU or the UK."hobble the UK's vaccination programme as well????
It's in UKs interests to divert resources elsewhere ultimately. The only question is "when?"I think you mean "ensure that all Europeans at serious risk of death are protected, whether they live in the EU or the UK."
Nobody is protected fully until all are protected fully. It is in Britain's interest to divert resources to our nearest neighbours and closest trading partners - unless you want your 2022 holiday to be in Blackpool again because there's an outbreak of the Berlin Covid variant in Benidorm.