Regardless of your thoughts on Brexit, I'm reminded that even Boris & chums concur that leaving the EU was very dodgy from an economic point of view. Our membership fee was repaid many times over by the benefits and opportunities of membership; all of that will be lost when our transitional deal ends in a few months time.
Will we apply to extend that transitional arrangement? It appears not, and perhaps that's a deliberate ploy by our government to 'force' a better trade deal, because "they need us more than we need them", but it's a huge gamble to risk alienation from our neighbours (friends), just at the time when we'll be trying to recover from the Corona depression. Where is the discussion and debate on these issues?
When the pandemic hit, our government consistently said we were 2-3 weeks behind countries (eg Italy). What a shame we didn't use those weeks constructively. Or if you look at the months of warning we had as events unfolded in Wuhan/China, what a shame we didn't use that time to better prepare. In fact, what a shame we didn't learn the lessons from those pandemic simulations that were carried out in recent years; you know, the similations that clearly identified the need for large stockpiles and production capacity of PPE.
No, instead of being prepared ,our government actively pursued policy of 'herd immunity' (aka "let half a million die"), and only changed course when it became clear the NHS would quickly reach a state of total collapse. Don't forget out government also ignored large parts of WHO guidance, and outright rejected opportunities to pool PPE purchasing power with other countries, whilst simultaneously failing to equip care homes, and actually discharging untested sick patients into their care. It's actually a disgusting and reckless failure; the resulting spike in infections & deaths is no surprise.
And what's happening now? A progressive relaxation of restrictions, despite repeated public misgivings from members of SAGE.
Something is clearly not right here; Government policy is at odds with scientific advice. Is Boris actually pursuing a resumption of the 'herd immunity' policy? It cetainly seems that way - as long as hospital bed occupancy is low enough not to overwhelm the NHS, Boris seems happy to throw the vulnerable section of society under the coronavirus bus.
So how many more will die at the hands of Boris?
39,000 is the official figure (deaths) to date in the UK, although the FT reported it as 62,000 if you consider 'excess deaths'. The recent antibody survey suggested only 7% of the population have had the virus, and the Imperial College study reckons the worst case scenario is 80% of the population contracting it. It's a very simple extrapolation to demonstrate we're not even one sixth of the way through this pandemic, unless something very dramatic happens like a vaccine, or an unexpected fizzling out.
If that doesn't happen, we might have as many as 700,000 deaths ; that's about 1% of the UK population dead. Hopefully those numbers are wrong.
But even going by current figures (absolute infections, absolute deaths, rates of each, etc), the UK rates as one of the worst-affected countries in the world. so can you imagine other countries welcoming UK tourists?
Or can you imagine international travellers wanting to come to the UK? The media reports about wanting "air corridors" seems like pie in the sky.
It seems more likely that we need to get used to our isolation for some time to come.
And if Boris wants to open the country up to the world, he needs to step up his game, even if that does mean making unpopular decisions.
Edited to add additional data.