Coronavirus outbreak

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
I have been listening to the daily virus updates and the constant questions over testing . The Health Secretary keeps saying that they hope to test 100,000 a day by the end of the month .
What I heard on the local news today is that if a care worker suspects that they may or may not have the virus then the only test centre is 60 miles away ! Surely they need more test facilities locally ?
 

tom73

Guru
Location
Yorkshire
Of course masks help. Witty gave the game away yesterday, he said that there isnt solid evidence they work, but they need to be given to the nhs rather than the general public. He also said they are always reviewing evidence. Bet my bottom dollar that once they have sufficient supply to the NHS that they will suddenly find evidence that they are worthwhile for the general population too.

If any change comes in it will be face coverings not clinical masks. That what the evidence is focused on and that's what WHO has been talking about. Clinical masks are only really of only of any use for the general public if the wearer is covid positive.
 

RoadRider400

Some bloke that likes cycling alone
If any change comes in it will be face coverings not clinical masks. That what the evidence is focused on and that's what WHO has been talking about. Clinical masks are only really of only of any use for the general public if the wearer is covid positive.
Can you explain how that works? Do the masks stop the virus penetrating it from one direction but not the other?
:wacko:
 

Rocky

Hello decadence
If any change comes in it will be face coverings not clinical masks. That what the evidence is focused on and that's what WHO has been talking about. Clinical masks are only really of only of any use for the general public if the wearer is covid positive.
My face covering protects you and yours protects me.

5B527888-6070-4023-824D-4CC40308573C.jpeg

This is what we need.
 
If any change comes in it will be face coverings not clinical masks. That what the evidence is focused on and that's what WHO has been talking about. Clinical masks are only really of only of any use for the general public if the wearer is covid positive.
But that's point - you don't know when you are infected. If you have a mask on - you limit the chances of passing it on.

I've said for a while airborne droplets would appear to be the major transmission route. All the handwashing didn't appear to slow the virus at all. Wearing masks might be more effective.
 
My face covering protects you and yours protects me.

View attachment 515822
This is what we need.
I've got loads of those - always wear them in the cold - so my nose going into overdrive.

People at the club say I look like I'm going Rob a bank !!
 

Milzy

Guru
I've heard a top scientist has a theory that as the graph flattens another wave could come in and as we flatten the next wave it could happen repeatedly up to 6 times.
As there's no vaccine for a long time it could also be possible to fall ill with the virus again, or keep spreading it. I can see the vulnerable and elderly practicing social distancing all the way up to Christmas.
 

Rocky

Hello decadence
I've heard a top scientist has a theory that as the graph flattens another wave could come in and as we flatten the next wave it could happen repeatedly up to 6 times.
As there's no vaccine for a long time it could also be possible to fall ill with the virus again, or keep spreading it. I can see the vulnerable and elderly practicing social distancing all the way up to Christmas.
University of Oxford are targeting having 1 million doses of a vaccine by September. The potential vaccine is undergoing clinical trials at the moment - of course it might not be effective but if it is, the vulnerable will be given it first.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52329659
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
I've said for a while airborne droplets would appear to be the major transmission route. All the handwashing didn't appear to slow the virus at all. Wearing masks might be more effective.
Did you not see the 2016 model that reckoned 800'000+ dead without hand-washing? Even the washing-but-no-lockdown 500'000 model never got quite that bad.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
University of Oxford are targeting having 1 million doses of a vaccine by September. The potential vaccine is undergoing clinical trials at the moment - of course it might not be effective but if it is, the vulnerable will be given it first.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52329659
Really? Doesn't the science still say that likely-super-spreaders (care, shop and cafe workers, and so on) should get it first? If not, what changed? (It doesn't seem to be in the linked article.)
 

Rocky

Hello decadence
Really? Doesn't the science still say that likely-super-spreaders (care, shop and cafe workers, and so on) should get it first? If not, what changed? (It doesn't seem to be in the linked article.)
BBC News at 6 had Prof Hill, head of the Jenner Institute in Oxford talking about the vaccine (I think in evidence to the Commons Select Cttee) saying that it would be rolled out in the normal way and given to vulnerable people first (much in the same way the 'flu jab is)
 
Top Bottom