@lane did you read the article through. This is as
@Milzy says: "all maybes"
And the reason they decided not to divert more vaccine supply there was that the population were not stepping up. So the whining of the MP and others should be introspective: 'we need to make more effort ourselves', to encourage vaccine uptake, through local community leaders. Blaming others gets nowhere. They must raise vaccine uptake in the hesitant over 50s (the vulnerable 98%): from these deliberately unvaccinated will be drawn the unhappy individuals who risk needing hospital after catching COVID-19.
Jane Scattergood, NHS Covid-19 vaccination programme lead in Lancashire and south Cumbria said it was “increasingly difficult to drive uptake in the eligible cohorts” during the second week of the surge fortnight in Blackburn. Not an "unjust" decision: a rational one.
Kate Hollern MP (local) said: “Given Blackburn has the highest rate of infections in the country, the government’s decision beggars belief. Without further surge vaccinations, the NHS will be placed under overwhelming and unnecessary pressure – the government’s inaction could cause entirely avoidable deaths across Lancashire.”
This assertion lacks logic. What will stop the spread of disease is not vaccines but good non-pharma interventions: willingness to get tested, adhering to quarantining and social distancing, and minimising inter household indoor mixing. The MP should harangue her constituents: it would have much greater effect on minimising the strain on the Royal Blackburn Hospitals (note that between the sites they have ~1000 beds. I haven't been able to find out how many are currently occupied by patients who have tested positive for COVID-19. But last November it had 240; way more than currently. Pressure: yes. Unwelcome: yes. Overwhelming: err, no.