mjr
Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
- Location
- mostly Norfolk, sometimes Somerset
How? Autumn is bang in line with their "million a week" target.what? darn! the news is getting worse!
How? Autumn is bang in line with their "million a week" target.what? darn! the news is getting worse!
I want it now, not a year from nowHow?
Due to covid or with covid?24,000 Americans died due to covid in the last 10 days
That's not the news getting worse, though. Indeed, some of the date calculators show much later!I want it now, not a year from now
My understanding is that very few die of covid. The dosage needs to be very high. The majority die with covid as an addition to existing medical conditions. This is all the more true the older the patient is.Due to covid or with covid?
My understanding is that very few die of covid. The dosage needs to be very high. The majority die with covid as an addition to existing medical conditions. This is all the more true the older the patient is.
It is also probably true that many of the fatalities are already near the age of normal life expectancy, and many might have died anyway in the fairly near future. In that regard, over a longer period of time it might be there will not be a huge increase in the average death rate over the course of the pandemic.
I've certainly seen this argued, especially by those trying to reduce the seriousness of the pandemic and/or the drastic measures being taken to curtail its spread. Those claiming 'it's like flu'.
I think there are two objections to this.
The first is that curtailing the spread is primarily to prevent healthcare being overwhelmed. If 5% of the UK population need admitting to hospital if infected over say the next year, this would mean over 3 million additional patients to the normal load. Even if you halve the percentage and extend the time as more younger and fitter people are infected who are less likely to need treatment, this is still far too many. The death rate will increase from treatable diseases where operations were postponed.
The second is that just because many of the fatalities are already old and frail this doesn't mean it doesn't matter if they die from it. They are still fully human and deserving of respect, and their deaths will still leave grieving families.
This may or may not be what your question was aiming at, but I have recently seen too many people playing down the seriousness of the situation either in comments sections or in their irresponsible actions using precisely this reasoning.
This morning I find myself trying to get a good grasp of the idea of setting up mass vaccination centres for the over-80s. Are we asking the elderly to break from shielding and massively increase their risk of infection while travelling? As far as I understand it, any immunity won't kick in until a fair while after getting the jab.
Can someone better qualified explain how the pitfalls can be avoided?
Thanks for the answer. It will remain to be seen how much longer people will have to wait because they're keeping themselves safe.The mass testing centres are an option - if they can't get to such centres, they will be offered a jab from the GP or something more local due course.
No.This morning I find myself trying to get a good grasp of the idea of setting up mass vaccination centres for the over-80s. Are we asking the elderly to break from shielding and massively increase their risk of infection while travelling? As far as I understand it, any immunity won't kick in until a fair while after getting the jab.
Can someone better qualified explain how the pitfalls can be avoided?
I had to look up the Stevenage MP to understand that reference!No.
Is the idea is to restore the priority treatment of cities, with a distracting sop to Stevenage to maybe line them up for an early derestriction trial to silence their anti-lockdown MP?
The other one is McPartlin, but even so, this one must be high on the list of "People we'd like to see put kangaroo balls in their mouth on TV"... Attached or not.I had to look up the Stevenage MP to understand that reference!
This morning I find myself trying to get a good grasp of the idea of setting up mass vaccination centres for the over-80s. Are we asking the elderly to break from shielding and massively increase their risk of infection while travelling? As far as I understand it, any immunity won't kick in until a fair while after getting the jab.
Can someone better qualified explain how the pitfalls can be avoided?