Coronavirus outbreak

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
The government is finally thinking of checking airline passengers for the virus on arrival. Isn't it a bit late when they could have infected all of the other passengers ? Surely they should have been prevented from getting on board ?
 

midlife

Guru
In theory everybody on board the plane should go into strict isolation. Anybody with an infection would then be negative after isolation. This requires a very strict policy of isolation which never happened. Also they will now accept lateral flow tests which miss about 50% of positive cases.

Isolation still applies for all passengers but can be released early if a second test here is negative.
 
In theory everybody on board the plane should go into strict isolation. Anybody with an infection would then be negative after isolation. This requires a very strict policy of isolation which never happened. Also they will now accept lateral flow tests which miss about 50% of positive cases.

Isolation still applies for all passengers but can be released early if a second test here is negative.
I think they reckon that only 5% isolate.
 

DCLane

Found in the Yorkshire hills ...
I think they reckon that only 5% isolate.

That's been the problem since March: when told to do so very few actually isolate for the full, or even part of, the time period. As such any test-and-trace system becomes worthless. In other countries they've been more compliant, possibly due to harsher penalties.

I do wonder whether the term 'self-isolate' brings meaning that it's a personal choice whether to do so or not, with no compulsion or penalty, has caused more problems than solutions.
 

roubaixtuesday

self serving virtue signaller
To me that seems completely daft. And a coffee isn't a 'picnic'!

They were using drones to harass dog walkers last time. Drunk on power IMO, and oblivious to any rational prioritisation of risk.
 

Joey Shabadoo

My pronouns are "He", "Him" and "buggerlugs"

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Local number of active cases (Lewisham, Zoe app).
7th December: 1360
7th January: 7676
1610128295941.png

A lot can happen in a month....
 

Joey Shabadoo

My pronouns are "He", "Him" and "buggerlugs"
Local number of active cases (Lewisham, Zoe app).
7th December: 1360
7th January: 7676
View attachment 567944
A lot can happen in a month....
Do you think arguing against restrictions was a good idea?
Mr Khan added: "If London was to go into Tier 3 it would be catastrophic to those industries already really crippled under the Covid pandemic, that could mean many shops going bust, many bars, pubs and restaurants going bust.
Harrods - 6th December
harrods.png
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Do you think arguing against restrictions was a good idea?
Did I? At the time, yes. The figures, as seen in the graph above, did not support the change of tier.

What people got up to during Santa's superspreader events, including Harrods crowds not observing social distancing, was totally indefensible. I was also in favour of a ''circuit breaker'' at half-term because it could have pushed the infection rate back down to September levels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjr

Joey Shabadoo

My pronouns are "He", "Him" and "buggerlugs"
Did I? At the time, yes. The figures, as seen in the graph above, did not support the change of tier.

What people got up to during Santa's superspreader events, including Harrods crowds not observing social distancing, was totally indefensible. I was also in favour of a ''circuit breaker'' at half-term because it could have pushed the infection rate back down to September levels.
I disagree in that it was clear what was going to happen - indeed was already happening as the Harrods pictures were showing. People were going to go nuts with Christmas shopping and there were going to be big groups of people mingling over the period. It's like looking at a big pile of twigs and paper saying "there is no fire" then throwing a lit match in. London with it's massive public transport network was always going to be high risk. Khan was arguing in favour of businesses making money rather than considering public health. For him to be wailing and complaining at the inevitable results of what he wanted is a bit rich.

I'm pretty sure if the government said "black", Khan would be on the radio shouting "white" within minutes.
 
Top Bottom