Funny how hostile some people can get when someone dares to express an opinion that falls outside the prescribed groupthink; sadly something that's rife in wider society too - much to our collective detriment
I'm a convert to waxing, as per my thread that Vicky's kindly posted above
While it was the efficiency angle that drew me in, I stayed for the clean drivetrain and seemingly enormous boost in component longevity.
I chose not to use PTFE for the environmental issues relating to its production and disposal; using Moly powder instead. However, I think this was un-necessary and added a disproportionate cost relative to the wax / liquid paraffin on its own, so would take this route in future.
There is no cleaning regime per se, as it's not really necessary since very little sticks to the dry-lubed chain. You want to re-wax the chain before it starts to squeak - with 300 miles being an appropriate point for me; not sure how stronger / heavier riders would fare. At this point the chain's just removed from the bike, put on the hanger, dropped in the pot and agitated for a few minutes, partially cooled, removed, fully cooled and refitted. I have multiple chains and leave waxing until I have at least two to do to minimise the sunk time involved in setup / process / cleanup (which really isn't terrible anyway).
Functionally the only downside is it's crap at protecting the chain from corrosion; if it gets wet I'll often chuck it in a tray in the oven at maybe 60 degrees which drives out the water and re-distributes the wax; potentially prolonging the time before a re-wax is necessary. I'm a fair-weather cyclist so can appreciate how this process might not be ideal for the more utilitarian rider who's out in all weathers.
Waxing arguably requires more gear than "traditional" methods of lubrication, but in my case both the setup and ongoing costs were / are next-to-nothing and I suspect it will more than pay for itself when chains, cassettes and chainrings last 2-3 times as long as they otherwise would have.
People claim that it's too much hassle and messy; however on both fronts I find it infinitely preferable to trying to clean a drivertrain with degreaser (another cost) and a brush; countless disposible cloths or those crappy little plastic devices you wind the chain through in the vain hope it's actually getting it clean.. while the areas between the links remain full of a lovely mix of oil, degreaser and abrasive particles. I imagine it might even take less time than having to deep-clean the whole drivetrain regularly; but maybe seems worse as all the time is in the prep rather than remedial / more immediately necessary action.
The on-bike clenliness is also a big win - funnily enough a neighbour remarked on how clean my drivetrain was (true story - he's also a cyclist
) and asked if I'd just cleaned it - my response being that other than re-waxing the chain periodically it'd seen zero attention for two years / 3.5k miles