Jameshow
Veteran
Yes, I've been there, thank you.
Of course it's vast, but that's no excuse for doing nothing. The area affected is about twice the size of Reading. Nevertheless, the scale isn't insurmountable if the necessary resources are in place the the project rotates through the area over the years. After all, the US can completely deforeset hundreds of thousands of acres when there's money to be made from doing so, but they're not so keen to do the less intensive work of thinning and managing an area when it's going to cost them.
At a technical level etc least Trump's idea was not at all fanciful. Probably by complete accident he came out with a sensible idea, at least at a technical level. People are dancing around the real issue which is who would pay for it- the expense would be vast, although less so if targeted in the few miles aprund the boundary of each settlement.
The expense would be eye watering, but then the expense in life, limb and property has already been eye-watering, so it comes down to a political will to spend the money preventatively instead of retrospectively.
It dies seem odd that they have forest (which in the climate can be very dry) right up close to the city.
They ought to have a buffer zone perhaps 5 miles surely??
Do they not have lookout posts for watching for fires as they do in other parts of American and Canada?
Also lakes reserved for fire fighting so the water supply isn't contaminated?