amaferanga
Veteran
- Location
- Bolton
i think there a case on both fronts ,do weights or dont do weights ,,which ever helps YOU is the best answer ,,i do em and they help me end of
How do you know they help? Claims like this is what misleads people.
i think there a case on both fronts ,do weights or dont do weights ,,which ever helps YOU is the best answer ,,i do em and they help me end of
Dan Martin has recently said he does less miles on the bike than many pro riders but spends more time in the gym working his legs than most. He says in the end it evens itself out and works well for him.How do you know they help? Claims like this is what misleads people.
Both methods are proven in the world of cycling. I also think a common misconception about doing weights is that you will end up with huge heavy muscles.If you do weights, how much faster would you be if you didn't?
if you didn't do weights, how much faster would you be if you did?
I'll rephase his questionBoth methods are proven in the world of cycling. I also think a common misconception about doing weights is that you will end up with huge heavy muscles.
Of course it is impossible to quantify but i hear this argument of weight training in cycling often. End of the day it works for some and might not for others. It is for the individual to try and decide based on their own experience. Some on here have no doubt been told weight training will help no end and others it is pointless. IMO both are incorrect. We, as cyclists, can only offer our opinion.I'll rephase his question
If I go to the gym and squat/leg press 100kg 10 x for 5 sets. How much faster will that make me directly?
If I don't go to the gym,instead training specifically by riding a bike- how much faster would going to the gym make me?
Neither of these questions will be answerable.
And it'll continue for decades probably.Of course it is impossible to quantify but i hear this argument of weight training in cycling often.
That's part of the issue. "Doing X works for me" is anecdotal. A lot of the people who claim weights helped their cycling also admit to increasing their mileage. It's probably not hard to see where the real gains come from.End of the day it works for some and might not for others. It is for the individual to try and decide based on their own experience.
Some on here have no doubt been told weight training will help no end and others it is pointless.
We can also research, and think for ourselves instead of swallowing everything pros print in books and mag editors send to print.IMO both are incorrect. We, as cyclists, can only offer our opinion.
There are always some to rely for various reasons on gym work,prescribed or otherwise. When you look at how and when different muscle fibre types are recruited, how they adapt to stimulation, the energy systems they use, their inherent blood flow, their speed of fatigue. The science alone weighs heavily on strength training having very little effect upon aerobic cycling. The exceptions generally limit themselves to sprinters or track racers,two examples where explosive but limited anaerobic efforts reign.It is often stated on here that weight training will offer no gain in terms of cycling. This is not 100% accurate and for that reason i think it is slightly misleading to make such claims. It is also wrong for someone to suggest that weights is the best or only way to increase leg strength.
Magazines, papers, books - sure those are a source. Lets discount them then assuming they misquote or mislead.And it'll continue for decades probably.
That's part of the issue. "Doing X works for me" is anecdotal. A lot of the people who claim weights helped their cycling also admit to increasing their mileage. It's probably not hard to see where the real gains come from.
We can also research, and think for ourselves instead of swallowing everything pros print in books and mag editors send to print.
There are always some to rely for various reasons on gym work,prescribed or otherwise. When you look at how and when different muscle fibre types are recruited, how they adapt to stimulation, the energy systems they use, their inherent blood flow, their speed of fatigue. The science alone weighs heavily on strength training having very little effect upon aerobic cycling. The exceptions generally limit themselves to sprinters or track racers,two examples where explosive but limited anaerobic efforts reign.
Precisely. You just have to realise that it might take a while to figure out what has the best results for you.So the bottom line do what you feel is best for you

Bleeergh, it's all a load of old Horlicks anyway, ain't it?!
Not just the stuff in this thread, I might add... I'm talking about life, in general. Do whatever you feel like!!
![]()