Flying_Monkey
Recyclist
- Location
- Odawa
I am just looking forward to the next volume of Lance's autobiography: It's Not About the Drugs.
Wow, I've come over all coy.He made a proposal of marriage to you up-thread...we've all been waiting on your reply ever since.
Did Ullrich ever test positive?
Assuming this is Hammond referring to himself, that doesn't surprise me.Hammond's comments on ITV4 Vuelta Highlights:
Never saw anything suspicious, and no pressure at Disco (2005 2006) to dope.
He was known as a clean rider and he never saw or heard anything.
If he had been in Armstrong's position he would have fought to clear his name.
He finds the ending very disappointing...
Who are you meaning? Armstrong, Ullrich, Hammond?I just want to see where he failed a test.
If the powers that be in cycling had the balls to put their house in order to begin with a lot of this type of thing would not occur. I don`t understand why they are still handing out 2 year bans. They should not only adopt a one strike and your out for life policy, they should adopt a one strike and your out PLUS we will then drag you through the courts in an an attempt to sieze all your assets which you have made from cycling.
Armstrong will be minted through his public appearances, books and endorsements. He will continue to make after dinner speeeches, more books etc telling the world how he was a scapegoat and a victim.
Make it plain that if you prove positive just once and it will start to make a difference.
They hand out 2 year bans because that is what has been agreed by the signatories to the World Anti Doping Code.
There are moves to make it a 4 year ban but it will probably take some time for all the signatories to reach agreement.
Any sanction must be seen to be proportionate to the offence, or it could lead to legal challenges.
To step back from cycling for a minute, the ban for a drink driving offence in Britain is usually 12 months, compare that with your proposed lifetime ban for a first doping offence and you can see the difficulties WADA face.
You still don't get it do you - the whole thing is about armstrong and the governing bodies colluding and covering up the cheatingI just want to see where he failed a test.
Yes I read that earlier, I think Steveindenmark was calling for a lifetime ban for ALL first offenders, whereas Armstrong is a special case.From http://road.cc/content/news/64076-u...ng-life-disqualifies-him-all-results-1-august
An extract from USADA's statement:
In accordance with the Code, aggravating circumstances including involvement in multiple anti-doping rule violations and participation in a sophisticated doping scheme and conspiracy as well as trafficking, administration and/or attempted administration of a prohibited substance or method, justify a period of ineligibility greater than the standard sanction. Accordingly, Mr. Armstrong has received a lifetime period of ineligibility for his numerous anti-doping rule violations, including his involvement in trafficking and administering doping products to others. A lifetime period of ineligibility as described in the Code prevents Mr. Armstrong from participating in any activity or competition organized by any signatory to the Code or any member of any signatory.
Breaking Billy Ocean-style News! Red Light spells Nobber