Alex321
Guru
- Location
- South Wales
That is not remotely likely to happen.It doesn't matter how annoyed everyone is. If most electric cars have a top speed of about 30mph and ICE ones are no longer available everyone will be doing 30mph.
The Ami is very much an exception - I can't see any reason why it might become the norm.
The writing is on the wall for ICE vehicles but electric cars with the performance of petrol ones are not viable for most people to have.
Right now, maybe not, but in 4-5 years time, they almost certainly will be.
Depends how you define a vanity purchase. I would say a Jag XJS, high end Merc or Audi TT are all vanity purchases.
No, a vanity purchase is something you buy mainly for the purpose of showing off your wealth/taste. Those are bought more because people want the performance than to show off.
Many are, agreed.I have a 2006 Vauxhall, which cost £850 last year - that wasn't a vanity purchase. Flogging it because I don't use it enough actually but if I need to buy another car if my circumstances change, I'm not spending much more than that. Modern cars are not sexy, they are consumer goods like washing machines.
It is pretty well completely inevitable. The technology is improving rapidly, and as there is more and more competition, together with economies of scale in production, that is sure to push prices downIn the state the global economy is in, I'd love to hear you explain how this is going to happen.
What's the cheapest EV now? Ten year old Nissan Leaf? What are the chances it will still work when it's the age my Vauxhall is now?
That one, maybe not. But again, you are looking at today, not looking a few years down the line. The leaf was relatively early EV technology, and it is moving on in leaps and bounds.
Perhaps you should read the article.Have a look at this - bigger engined cars kill more people, and there is proof (quote if you don't want to read the article):
It isn't "bigger engined", it is bigger bodied, and in particular the SUV type body shape - and that is a result of a large flat area at the front rather than the relatively low bonnet of a normal car.
Well yes, it is of course utterly obvious that a collision at any given speed is more likely to cause damage than one at 2/3 of the speed.https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlto...in-u-k-cities-urge-transport-data-scientists/
As to speed, I direct you to this - in particular this quote direct from the article:
https://www.brake.org.uk/get-involved/take-action/mybrake/knowledge-centre/speed/speed-and-injury
But there is, of course, much more to the equation than that. You have to also include the likelihood of collision at any given speed. Which is, of course, why different road types have different speed limits. Our motorways have the fastest speed limits of any UK roads, and are pretty busy, but they also have the fewest casualties of any roads.
In mainly city driving, almost certainly. That is why a lot of the smaller cars are sold as "city cars". Outside town, almost certainly not.The evidence is clear that small, slow vehicles are faster than big, "high end" vehicles with a ludicrous top speed that makes them inherently incompatible with any sort of active travel.
What relevance does that comment have? I can't see anything he wrote that could possibly be taken to read that they might.Have you heard the news about nurses being on strike because of crap conditions? And the record numbers of people leaving both of those professions? Bless you but you're living in dreamland if you think people doing those jobs think they're any sort of cushy number.