- Location
- Inside my skull
I have been close passed
Which is very much risking a collision. The close pass is a conscious decision not to slow, stop and wait till it’s safe to make a wider overtake and avoiding that risk.
I have been close passed
Which is very much risking a collision. The close pass is a conscious decision not to slow, stop and wait till it’s safe to make a wider overtake and avoiding that risk.
I still think most are mistakes.
How on earth do you make the mistake of trying to close overtake someone on a bike as the road narrows. Or fail to wait when there are parked cars obstructing their side of the highway, and someone on a bike is coming towards them? It’s a conscious decision not to slow, and if necessary stop and wait.
Mistake would imply they didn’t intend to refuse to stop or change their line on the road. They accidentaly forget to turn the steering wheel and apply the brakes.
And I still stand absolutely by what I said initially on this. I do not know anybody who has the attitude you describe.
I'm sure you are right, he is not nearly the only one.In which case you must have a very narrow circle of acquaintances.
I'm saddened to know a van driver who will drive as close as he can to cyclists 'for sport'. I'm sure he's not the only one.
I'm sure you are right, he is not nearly the only one.
But I do not think people with that sort of attitude are at all common.
"Not paying attention" is a conscious and, for a road user, an unacceptable choice: "careless" is the applicable adjective: escalating to dangerous depending on the circumstances. "Be in the narrow bit"! Drive on the "bit of the road" that vehicles coming the other way will be using, but not 'deliberately'?I think it more often a case of not paying enough attention to realise they are going to be in the narrow bit, or even not noticing the cyclist until too late.
Absolutely bad driving in either of those cases, but not really a case of deliberately thinking "I'm going to choose to squeeze that cyclist".
If an accident involving a pedestrian and a cyclist on a shared pavement, both cannot be faulted. Pedestrians love to day dream and look at the handphone while walking and cyclists love not to stop for nothing to stay in momentum. That’s natural human behaviour. The blame should be on the infrastructure. Cars must be physically segregated from bicycles and bicycles from pedestrians because all of them move at different speed. Is that simple. Cars are killing countless of people each year. If it’s an organisation, it would have been closed down long time ago but yet we lived with it somehow.
I don't know a single person who fits your description after "unless" there. Every single person I know would still rather slow or stop than risk a collision, even when in a car.