Pale Rider
Legendary Member
The lawyer should not, ethically, be making remarks unless she believes them to be true.
People may sneer at the concept of lawyers and ethics, but they operate in public.
If she is 'making shoot up', she will very quickly be caught out.
There is some poetic licence, and the information may not be rigorously checked.
In other words, the defendant tells her in conference he has diabetes and it sometimes make him feel a bit odd.
She presents that in court - with a bit of topspin.
She also mentioned 'a moment of madness' which may have been her way of selling the lesser charge of careless driving to the jury.
However, the defendant still banjoed the cyclist, so the judge could have sent him away just for that.
People may sneer at the concept of lawyers and ethics, but they operate in public.
If she is 'making shoot up', she will very quickly be caught out.
There is some poetic licence, and the information may not be rigorously checked.
In other words, the defendant tells her in conference he has diabetes and it sometimes make him feel a bit odd.
She presents that in court - with a bit of topspin.
She also mentioned 'a moment of madness' which may have been her way of selling the lesser charge of careless driving to the jury.
However, the defendant still banjoed the cyclist, so the judge could have sent him away just for that.