Zwift Chat

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Legs

usually riding on Zwift...
Location
Staffordshire
Another UCI Worlds course, presumably. Nice.
Not quite - a bit more 'Scotland-inspired', like France and Makuri:
1670584548125.png
 

Peter Salt

Bittersweet
Location
Yorkshire, UK
He didn't need to - his PM pedals were over reporting by 25% anyway.

His race performance data came from his trainer not his pedals - they were just used for the dual recording back up data. It's his trainer than needed the software intervention and the investigation suggested that's what he did (eg the disconnection of a data channel just before the race etc)
Stupid question from someone who actually never owned a set: How do you miscalibrate those by 25%? Wouldn't a margin like that require some type of sophisticated tampering?
 

JuhaL

Guru
Trainer itself can be way out of calibration as well and give too high readings. It would be tempting to use that trainer when you race. What was the trainer what Eddy Hoole use?.
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Stupid question from someone who actually never owned a set: How do you miscalibrate those by 25%? Wouldn't a margin like that require some type of sophisticated tampering?

I'm no expert on that (I don't even own a PM) but I understand there's a relatively easy way to do it with some pedal PMs by setting the crank length different to what you actually have, and some further basic fudging with the PM app or Garmin
 

alex_cycles

Veteran
Location
Oxfordshire
Stupid question from someone who actually never owned a set: How do you miscalibrate those by 25%? Wouldn't a margin like that require some type of sophisticated tampering?

I've not done it, but I believe there is a way to recalibrate power meter pedals by hanging weights off them. You could just input the wrong values when doing it (but there is a lot of confusion around use of the word calibration because Garmin and most of the other power meter makers use the term "calibrate" to describe the Zero offset that you're meant to do before every ride :eek:)
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Trainer itself can be way out of calibration as well and give too high readings. It would be tempting to use that trainer when you race. What was the trainer what Eddy Hoole use?.

It can, but that's why they have dual recording - it would be extremely unlikely that both the trainer and the PM were mis-calbrated by exactly the same amount.

I'm not sure what trainer he was using
 

Peter Salt

Bittersweet
Location
Yorkshire, UK
OK, got it. I was initially thinking that he applied the same cheating model to both power sources and didn't understand how that would be possible in a controlled test. Looks like he did the Ant+ shenanigans with his trainer and for the pedals played around with miscalibration, made sure that both report the same levels of power so the dual recording looked legit. This guy went through some lengths!
 

JuhaL

Guru
It can, but that's why they have dual recording - it would be extremely unlikely that both the trainer and the PM were mis-calbrated by exactly the same amount.

I'm not sure what trainer he was using

That's true. Only way how power meter and trainer can show same readings is Elite trainers PML (powermeter link). It means that you can use same separate power meter with trainer what is installed to your bike. That feature is only with Elite trainers though. Is dual recording eliminate that as well?.
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
That's true. Only way how power meter and trainer can show same readings is Elite trainers PML (powermeter link). It means that you can use same separate power meter with trainer what is installed to your bike. That feature is only with Elite trainers though. Is dual recording eliminate that as well?.

I don't really know how that Elite thing works but ultimately they have to provide a separate recording of power from a power meter source other than their trainer - literally a spearate data file
 

Brusgaard

Über Guru
Location
Skive, Denmark
OK, got it. I was initially thinking that he applied the same cheating model to both power sources and didn't understand how that would be possible in a controlled test. Looks like he did the Ant+ shenanigans with his trainer and for the pedals played around with miscalibration, made sure that both report the same levels of power so the dual recording looked legit. This guy went through some lengths!

If you (read: a computer (PC or Raspberry Pi etc.)) read the ANT+ signals from your trainer and PM, add 25% to the power value and then relay/retransmit the signal to the bike computer and the Zwift computer. I suspect that is how it was done?
 

<Tommy>

Illegitimi non carborundum
Location
Camden, London
D'you think it's really likely though? Unless you're competing for real prizes, what's the gain?

I do Alex. I don’t get it at all. But I see it. Doping is rife in amateur bike racing. They just don’t have the funding or infrastructure to catch it. Often middle aged men, prepared to put their health jeopardy taking EPO for zero financial gain. There’s always going to be people prepared to cheat given the opportunity. And often for very little reward if any on offer.

There’s a sliding scale really isn’t there? A sliding scale of ethics if you can call it that? This guy is at the extreme end maybe. Or maybe the drug cheats are. At the other end you have completely honest people. Then in between you have the weight dopers, the sandbaggers etc etc etc. Why do people do any of this stuff. I guess we all draw our own ethical line right?
 
Top Bottom