Legs
usually riding on Zwift...
- Location
- Staffordshire
Not quite - a bit more 'Scotland-inspired', like France and Makuri:Another UCI Worlds course, presumably. Nice.
Not quite - a bit more 'Scotland-inspired', like France and Makuri:Another UCI Worlds course, presumably. Nice.
Stupid question from someone who actually never owned a set: How do you miscalibrate those by 25%? Wouldn't a margin like that require some type of sophisticated tampering?He didn't need to - his PM pedals were over reporting by 25% anyway.
His race performance data came from his trainer not his pedals - they were just used for the dual recording back up data. It's his trainer than needed the software intervention and the investigation suggested that's what he did (eg the disconnection of a data channel just before the race etc)
Stupid question from someone who actually never owned a set: How do you miscalibrate those by 25%? Wouldn't a margin like that require some type of sophisticated tampering?
Stupid question from someone who actually never owned a set: How do you miscalibrate those by 25%? Wouldn't a margin like that require some type of sophisticated tampering?
Trainer itself can be way out of calibration as well and give too high readings. It would be tempting to use that trainer when you race. What was the trainer what Eddy Hoole use?.
It can, but that's why they have dual recording - it would be extremely unlikely that both the trainer and the PM were mis-calbrated by exactly the same amount.
I'm not sure what trainer he was using
That's true. Only way how power meter and trainer can show same readings is Elite trainers PML (powermeter link). It means that you can use same separate power meter with trainer what is installed to your bike. That feature is only with Elite trainers though. Is dual recording eliminate that as well?.
Hey lads, we need to talk. It sounds that soon the whole cyclechat team is on A Cat and FTP is something like 700w at least.
OK, got it. I was initially thinking that he applied the same cheating model to both power sources and didn't understand how that would be possible in a controlled test. Looks like he did the Ant+ shenanigans with his trainer and for the pedals played around with miscalibration, made sure that both report the same levels of power so the dual recording looked legit. This guy went through some lengths!
It is scary to think loads of people may be doing this, they just didn't turn the juice up to 11If you (read: a computer (PC or Raspberry Pi etc.)) read the ANT+ signals from your trainer and PM, add 25% to the power value and then relay/retransmit the signal to the bike computer and the Zwift computer. I suspect that is how it was done?
It is scary to think loads of people may be doing this, they just didn't turn the juice up to 11
D'you think it's really likely though? Unless you're competing for real prizes, what's the gain?
D'you think it's really likely though? Unless you're competing for real prizes, what's the gain?