Words that annoy me for no particular reason.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

winjim

Smash the cistern
An Aussie I follow refers to uranium as 'uraniums', a term that has lodged itself permanently in my brain.
I do quite like it though. (the word, not the element)
Are you sure they don't mean the flowers?
 

mudsticks

Obviously an Aubergine
Not in the UK though. The "freshwater" bass aka largemouth (and smallmouth) bass is primarily of North American descent.

However there are European & Asian seabass. What riles me is when the UK chef's call the UK bass sea bass.

There were rumours many years ago that the Americans, I think at Lakenheath tried to introduce largemouth bass in the UK into ponds, but I think it was a myth.


Whenever I'm walking along a beach behind a row of fishermen, whatever the weather.

I will glance across, and enthusiastically opine on passing that it's

"Looking quite 'bassy' today! "

Without breaking stride.

- Of course i have no real knowledge of sea fishing, or the conditions required for any particular quarry.

But the resulting hard stare, that they then almost invariably give the sea, keeps me quietly entertained.

:angel:
 

Pale Rider

Legendary Member
Less for quantities, fewer for numbers. So:

Less wine, fewer glasses.
Less sugar, fewer lumps.
Less water, fewer raindrops.

It all depends on whether you can count it or not.

[/pedant]

If only it were that simple.

'Less' would normally used in front of counting nouns denoting distance, amounts, or time.

Few people would say something is due to happen in 'fewer than six weeks', it would be 'less than six weeks'.

Or: 'the bomb is due to explode in fewer than ten minutes' doesn't work, it would be '...in less than ten minutes'.

'My bike ride today was fewer than 60 miles', no, accepted usage is '...was less than 60 miles'.

There are further complications, some of which I don't claim to fully understand.
 
I sincerely apologise. Henceforth I shall endeavour to diversify my vocabulary and utilise more loquacious terms in my epistles.
557639
 
He was of course referring to all isotopes of Uranium.

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-xLUEMj6cwA

Ruddy splitters!
 
If only it were that simple.

'Less' would normally used in front of counting nouns denoting distance, amounts, or time.

Few people would say something is due to happen in 'fewer than six weeks', it would be 'less than six weeks'.

Or: 'the bomb is due to explode in fewer than ten minutes' doesn't work, it would be '...in less than ten minutes'.

'My bike ride today was fewer than 60 miles', no, accepted usage is '...was less than 60 miles'.

There are further complications, some of which I don't claim to fully understand.
Interesting point, fella.

My instinct is telling me that this is probably related to our tendency to break time and space into discrete chunks, whereas in reality time and space doesn't work that way.

You can count the minutes and measure the miles and the litres in a container, but these numbers don't actually exist outside of our arbitrary definitions of those units, whereas physically distinct objects can be counted, and thus, can be fewer.

"I have 9 coins. You have 10. Therefore, I have fewer coins, and less money."

I blame Zeno of Elea. It's all Greek to me...
 

newfhouse

Resolutely on topic
Except the BMJ only reference it in the terms that the media are using - they are not designating it as a medical condition in it's own right, or suggesting that as anew name for Covid 19 symptoms.
Not everything on the BBC is a lefty plot. It’s a perfectly cromulent formation.
 

swee'pea99

Legendary Member
Interesting point, fella.

My instinct is telling me that this is probably related to our tendency to break time and space into discrete chunks, whereas in reality time and space doesn't work that way.

You can count the minutes and measure the miles and the litres in a container, but these numbers don't actually exist outside of our arbitrary definitions of those units, whereas physically distinct objects can be counted, and thus, can be fewer.

"I have 9 coins. You have 10. Therefore, I have fewer coins, and less money."

I blame Zeno of Elea. It's all Greek to me...
Also interesting. My instinct tallies with yours. We don't say 'fewer than ten minutes' because we don't mean nine minutes, or eight minutes, we mean some 'amount' smaller than the 'amount of time' that is ten minutes.

Of course the related interesting oddity of the language is that we have no equivalent to fewer for positives rather than negatives. Fewer jars, less honey; more jars, more honey.
 
Also interesting. My instinct tallies with yours. We don't say 'fewer than ten minutes' because we don't mean nine minutes, or eight minutes, we mean some 'amount' smaller than the 'amount of time' that is ten minutes.

Of course the related interesting oddity of the language is that we have no equivalent to fewer for positives rather than negatives. Fewer jars, less honey; more jars, more honey.
What are your views on putting spokes under compression?

:whistle:
 
Top Bottom