Aperitif said:I have a pedal in both camps as there is no axe to grind. (How about that for a cycling mixed metaphor?)
Be friends. Life is too short to be upset about a web forum.
(Ok - so we will not be visiting that iffy MTB section but...)
gbyers said:However, right now they have 114 users on line and there are less than 20 here. This often seems to be the case ie approaching 10:1.
I know there's more to stats than just stats ( ) but this kind of numbers disparity suggests to me that maybe those of us who think this is a better forum need to work a bit harder to keep critical mass.
Arch said:gbyers said:However, right now they have 114 users on line and there are less than 20 here. This often seems to be the case ie approaching 10:1.
I know there's more to stats than just stats ( ) but this kind of numbers disparity suggests to me that maybe those of us who think this is a better forum need to work a bit harder to keep critical mass.
Yeah, but 114 yoofs going on about "radical" MTBs as opposed to 20 erudite raconteurs talking about... oh... girls in lycra...
I'm not worried about the numbers. This place will continue to grow now, perhaps a little more slowly than in the last week or so, but I'm confident that it will keep turning over nicely...
I went back to have a look at BR yesterday, looked at a couple of threads, but haven't posted, and probably won't again. I really only want one forum, and this is it. Apart from Velovision that is. So two forums. But that's it!
barq said:My prediction for BR would be that the more dominant groups (rad MTBers*) will become even more dominant with time and that many more of the C+ lot will leave for elsewhere. I think people like to be in online communities where there are clear accepted norms. That's all up in the air at the moment because C+ and WMB (for example) were very different beasts.
Now I've got that out the way, I have noticed instances of extremely good technical debate on BR. Someone asked a fairly basic question about what makes a wheel strong and suddenly people pitched in with the most informed discussion of spoke tension I've seen outside of Jobst Brandt's book! Now a few more threads like that could see me popping back. From the social perspective there isn't much to keep me there now I've found this place.
ajevans said:I occasionally have a look, but most of the road sections seem pretty dead.
The place is infested with annoying MTB'ers with an axe to grind against roadiers, and even one of their moderators (Nick Louse) comes across more like a troll.
ajevans said:I occasionally have a look, but most of the road sections seem pretty dead.
The place is infested with annoying MTB'ers with an axe to grind against roadiers, and even one of their moderators (Nick Louse) comes across more like a troll.
Yorkshireman said:Plenty of information (a bit 'forthright' at times) on such topics on rec.bicycles.tech (on Newsgroups) including Jobst himself.
ajevans said:[edit] most of the road sections seem pretty dead.
The place is infested with annoying MTB'ers with an axe to grind against roadiers, and even one of their moderators (Nick Louse) comes across more like a troll.
That's why I don't even look over there any more. I got fed up with any criticism of the layout being met, eventually, with a barrage of 'you roadie/c+ lot are all snobs and think you're better than us' etc. Not to mention the FHM/lad mag tendencies of a number of the MBUK crew. One of them mistook me for a lesbian. I poked him with a pointy stick and let him wallow in his crass assumptions. I got a barrage of abuse in return, 'you fat middle-aged lesbo' being one that sticks in the mind. According to his mates on there he's a really nice bloke, honestly. Hurling homophobic and sexist abuse at a complete stranger? Yeah, what a lovely bloke.ajevans said:The place is infested with annoying MTB'ers with an axe to grind against roadiers, and even one of their moderators (Nick Louse) comes across more like a troll.