Keith Oates said:
From what I've read you only have the word of a guy who's leaving the company and is putting you up to this when he is himself out of the way. Without the watertight evidence I would leave it alone and just continue hating the guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I agree.
At the moment, it is only hearsay.
Even if true, I still have serious reservations.
These expenses which are being paid by the company are being included in the accounts. As what? By whom?
Unless the manager is solely responsible for the accounting process, someone else is not doing their job either.
Is the manager the same nationality as the directors? How do we
know that his perks don't include a significant discretionary spending allowance?
I have seen examples of overseas subsidiaries being used by directors and their cronies as slush funds. They get away with it because that branch "will never make profit". In one case, the local director complained about the effect it was having on profits and was crucified for threatening the status quo. A multinational and their multinational accountants can muster a LOT of expensive lawyers.
What you have heard about may be the tip of the iceberg.
Or it may be sough grapes.