Where have all the anti-vaxxers gone?

[ebikeerwidnes]

we may end up with the new guy having bigger numbers!

 

[Johnno260]

A few jems from a prominent anti vax/flat earther I comment on, the comments got me.

Be safe people.

Some grade A research “pfeizer and skin to skin inhalation” on an official document.

I don’t know wether to laugh or cry about the last comment.

 

[KnittyNorah]

Some grade A research “pfeizer and skin to skin inhalation” on an official document.

I don’t know wether to laugh or cry about the last comment.

Oh wow. Just wow.
What alternate reality are they in?
HIV? Skin to skin inhalation? Poison?

Don't they know that the devices they are using to spread this ... this ... turdism are tracking them all the time ...? And constantly exposing them to different sorts of radiation! Heck - they can probably inhale the radiation through their skin!

 

[Ajax Bay]

"I don't want Injected bodily fluids"! Sexless marriage then?

 

[Ajax Bay]

Don't think inhalation of radiation is a thing, is it?

 

[Johnno260]

Don't think inhalation of radiation is a thing, is it?

I'm still stuck on skin to skin inhalation..... on the official documentation.

I know engaging with these people is pointless, but if it stops one person teetering on the edge of the rabbit hole I will take that as a win.

 

[Johnno260]

Oh wow. Just wow.
What alternate reality are they in?
HIV? Skin to skin inhalation? Poison?

Don't they know that the devices they are using to spread this ... this ... turdism are tracking them all the time ...? And constantly exposing them to different sorts of radiation! Heck - they can probably inhale the radiation through their skin!

My aunt on a family Zoom call starting speaking about vaccine trackers, I said you have an iphone in your hand, and a GPS smart watch, she didn't see the irony.

She mentioned the pet chips, I said those are a larger needle, and I said the range is pitiful the receiver the vet uses is basically point blank, I said the antenna and power needed for something to be a proper tracker would make it far far larger, but that little piece of science doesn't matter.

 

[C R]

Now they would rather take horse doses of ivermectin than have the vaccine.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...estock-drug-sweeping-america-covid-ivermectin

There's no hope for humanity.

 

[Johnno260]

Now they would rather take horse doses of ivermectin than have the vaccine.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...estock-drug-sweeping-america-covid-ivermectin

There's no hope for humanity.

I can’t decide if I want to laugh or cry at that.

I have seen people defending Shemirani today as well after her antics in Brighton.

 

[Milzy]

They think HCQ kills cancer cells but the deep state don’t want you to know that because they get too much money from other drugs & let the population die off.

 

[KnittyNorah]

Don't think inhalation of radiation is a thing, is it?

Inhalation of radioactive gases, vapours and particles - and hence irradiation resulting in the lungs - certainly is a thing ...
In fact, inhalation of naturally-occurring radon gas is one of the main sources of natural radiation exposure.
But you're quite right - you don't actually inhale 'radiation' as such!

 

[cougie uk]

I can't wait to see them trying to poo the virus out.
And now a judge in the States has ruled that a sick patient can have dewormer if he wants it.
That'll probably finish him off.

 

[Edwardoka]

Pity that the horse dewormer can't get at the worms infesting their brains.

 

[KnittyNorah]

W- e-e- l - l .... being honest and factual, ivermectin is an almost miraculous preventive, when administered correctly, of River Blindness.
So maybe - just maybe - it will act similarly against metaphorical blindness ...

No, I didn't think so. Pity.

 

[Ajax Bay]

You're all being rather negative about Ivermectin. Are there studies which show it is harmful if taken in human dose quantities? Clearly it would be sensible to use medicine designed and produced for human consumption but that can only be obtained on prescription, hence people reaching out for product designed for animals (assumed to be at lower quality and certainly low assurance).
Are there studies which show it has prophylactic benefit (ie Norah's "preventive" (sic)) against COVID-19? None of any quality - because people have been refused funding to do any, probably because there seems no likelihood that there would be benefit (so would be difficult to get through the ethics committee (for human testing).
There are many other 'anti-vaxx static targets to fire at: no need to fire at moving ones. Providing people don't overdose themselves there is little harm other than levels of side effect similar to many other regularly consumed medical drugs. There might be a placebo effect.