winjim
Smash the cistern
Theoretical propositions do need to be demonstrated empirically and sometimes complex maths is required to analyse the data. What we need is a culture where we can allow the experts to interpret and explain the maths in a way that a lay person can understand and importantly, trust. Which is fine, and things can be simplified to a certain extent, but how do you do that while trying to overcome the biases of someone in the entrenched position of a fundamentalist antivaxxer?Johnno - But this can be true, as @winjim says. Maths and statistics aren't all lies used to deceive us, but can be used mendaciously or to mislead.
If a claim is made, you surely support checking it referring to reliable 'facts' using transparent maths as needed.
Personally I think you can't, which is why you should target the undecideds and not the fundies.
Last edited: