I would question the Both element of your comment. I am not totally sure that they aren't one and the same. Whatever @Yellow Saddle says @Citius follows...albeit without adding much to argument.Its seems to me that both you and citius are very special.....but still cant quantify or give a reason why aero wheels are useless for 99% of people on race bikes...
I think it's known as Option C:
1. @Yellow Saddle says something and backs it up with data.
2. Someone else disagrees, and questions the data, not always having the same knowledge to give alternative data.
3. @Citius backs up @Yellow Saddle and says you're a fool if you don't instantly agree, but fails to add anything further in terms of data.
4. Argument continues until the person at point 2 gets bored.