The campaign for better transport did a headline grabbing study a while back that for cycling & walking ranked various cities in this order:-
1 NOTTINGHAM
2 MANCHESTER
2 CAMBRIDGE
4 MILTON KEYNES
5 BRIGHTON AND HOVE
6 NEWCASTLE
6 BRISTOL
8 SOUTHAMPTON
8 PLYMOUTH
10 LONDON
10 LIVERPOOL
12 LEEDS
13 LEICESTER
13 LUTON
15 PETERBOROUGH
16 SUNDERLAND
17 BIRMINGHAM
18 COVENTRY
19 SHEFFIELD
If you're wondering why, the questions to decide this were
C1 Children who walk or cycle to school
Percent of children (aged 5-15) who walk or cycle
to school in each city
C2 Condition of footway
General condition of footpaths along main roads
(BVPI 187 Category 1 and 2 Footways) – using
a consistent approach specified by the Audit
Commission. Expressed as a percentage.
C3 Population within 15 minutes of city centre
by cycle
Percentage of households within 15 minutes
cycle of each city centre
C4 Percentage of journeys using bicycle during
commuter time journeys
Estimated percentage journeys during commuter
time (7am - 9.59am) by cycling
I would say the best cycling city is probably London.
As a Nottingham cycle commuter I pray for the rest of the population that Nottingham isn't the best city to cycle in.
C1 is walking and cycling, therefore irrelevant (both my kids walk to school, but have never cycled. I pass a lot of kids walking to school)
C2 pavement/footpath could be in great condition but completely pointless for cyclists (see Jezston's post)
C3 population near city centre by bike, doesn't mean anyone actually rides a bike, just that if they did it wouldn't take long to go to the shops! (or cinema, pub, etc)
C4 percentage of journeys by bike. I'd like to see the results of this question.
So in Nottingham (according to me) we have nice pavements with lots of kids walking to school. Lots of people living near the city centre and a small percentage of commuters who cycle.
Surely the DFT Cycling Cities (Bristol, Exeter, Cambridge, York, etc) must be the best?