Having been brought up NZ, football (soccer) was a 'puffs' game for 2nd class citizens. You got a steady diet of rugby on tv/radio and people assumed you knew and liked the game. I naturally played football and fondly remember listening to English football commentary live on the World Service.
At college, we had no football team - but 6 or 7 rugby teams & 2 hockey teams. When we played another college that had a football team, those of us that played football would form a team - a kind of de-facto 1st XI. But there was no teacher to coach or anything like that - we were on us tod.
So naturally, when I left NZ, I had a good knowledge of rugby but a bit of a dislike for it. However, the UK roots were in Leicester - so I got to see the Tigers quite a bit as my uncle was a member. I used to take myself to see Leicester City - Spion Kop was £2ish as I remember. I followed Leicester City for years and was a season ticket holder for some of those, even though I lived in London. Then it happened.... football became crap. It was early 90s for me I guess. I blame Sky and painted faces.... "family football". It suddenly became product (more so than it was anyway). I was spending £100 a game on average (as a single bloke) and I didn't enjoy it. I simply stopped going.
My had Kiwi mates in London and I joined them in (beer and) rugby Saturdays. I had the completely bizare experience of going to Loftus Road (Queens Park Rangers) - a ground I knew well from football - to watch Wasps play rugby. Beer on the terraces! Women on the terraces!!
From that date to this, I have preferred rugby to football. It reliably remains, for me, the more enjoyable game to watch. That's not to say you can't get enjoyable games of football - you can - but rugby is more likely to be enjoyable and I would always recommend it live over football. More so here in France where the average standard of football is very poor. Outside of a couple of teams, the game is dull beyond believe.
Sorry, a long way of saying 'rugby'!