What needs changing on bikes?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Fastpedaller

Über Member
According to the late Mike Burrows, the only 'new' invention for bikes was the clipless pedal in it's various forms.
Everything else, he reckoned had already been done, but lacked either the suitable materials and / or the techno knowhow to make it work properly.
Was he right - ? :whistle:
476171-132bf386488e89b0ef04902716d07895.jpg
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
That was one of the late Jobst Brandt's personal hobby horses. I believe he even wrote to Shimano and suggested a tapered interface*. The big problem is overcoming the embedded market of pedals using a flat interface. Shops would hate doubling up on it and buyers wouldn't want to buy new cranks, so it would be a "new bike" thing - and new bikes don't come with good pedals, because everyone changes them.

*also removes the need for the LH thread on the LH side

Doesn't seem to bother them with Bottom Brackets ;)
 
Another post said the rider. He is correct, because IMO there are too many luddite cyclist wed to the 1890 DF so called safety bike. They wont admit there are other types of frames and number of wheels that better serve many cyclist. Time does march on.

Recumbants and tricycles are not a new invention.
Some of us have tried and failed miserably with three wheels.
Recumbents can be more difficult to store with the wider seat. Rotate the bars and drop the pedals off a DF and it's a very slim package indeed.

DF bikes are cheaper. And, IMHO good enough. Yes 'bents are lovely and comfortable in what limited experience I have with them (I had a Brox quadricycle - which was amazing for its utility much more than anything else) but these types of posts (luddite - really?) might not have the effect you think they have.

You ride a recumbent and you seem very happy with that. There's absolutely no need to call people who ride conventional bikes luddites.

The main thing that puts people off cycling isn't the bikes - it's traffic, badly behaved motorists (also people), the perception that cycles/HPVs are toys and that people who ride them for transport, or even dare I say as part of a group wearing lycra are deviants.
 
Last edited:

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
Another post said the rider. He is correct, because IMO there are too many luddite cyclist wed to the 1890 DF so called safety bike. They wont admit there are other types of frames and number of wheels that better serve many cyclist. Time does march on.

Increasingly obvous troll becomes increasingly obvious...
 

Gwylan

Veteran
Location
All at sea⛵
And make the fairings of a translucent material you can see through to spot potholes. Full fairing would boost most riders average speeds by at least 6-10 mph rendering e-bikes obsolete.

Pot hole radar.

As equipped cyclists pass by the system information is gathered and processed.

Successive cyclists receive warnings if the road state informed by cycle speed and location.
The information is real time and evolves through time.

Also the presence of a cyclist will be included in systems like Waze to alert motorists.
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
Another post said the rider. He is correct, because IMO there are too many luddite cyclist wed to the 1890 DF so called safety bike. They wont admit there are other types of frames and number of wheels that better serve many cyclist. Time does march on.

What an ugly-minded post.

The post suggesting the rider was NOTHING to do with your nasty suggestion.
 
What an ugly-minded post.

The post suggesting the rider was NOTHING to do with your nasty suggestion.

What is ugly is the clique that think only a UCI DF bike is the only kind of bike or cycling there is. I consider little Susie on her sidewalk bike with training wheels a cyclist.

Here in the US, more and more of cross country cyclist are going to trikes. When you ride all day, day after day, comfort becomes paramount. And a trike has 3 wheels to carry the load, and doesnt fall over.
 
Last edited:

Punkawallah

Über Member
What is ugly is the clique that think only a UCI DF bike is the only kind of bike or cycling there is. I consider little Susie on her sidewalk bike with training wheels a cyclist.

Here in the US, more and more of cross country cyclist are going to trikes. When you ride all day, day after day, comfort becomes paramount. And a trike has 3 wheels to carry the load, and doesnt fall over.

I did not know that. Are your tracks wide enough, or is the bike narrow enough?
 

Mazz

Senior Member
Location
Leicester
You're all kitted-up and ready to go on a nice ride, but WAIT!
Your tyre pressure's low & need a top-up to get it just right.
But WAIT! It's just TYPICAL, isn't it?... the valve is lurking behind the seat-stay or chain-stay! We've all been there, right?

The answer? It's here! The QuadValve® 4-valve inner tube® (only compatible with QuadValve® rims, of course).

Insist on QuadValve® - It's the future.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
You're all kitted-up and ready to go on a nice ride, but WAIT!
Your tyre pressure's low & need a top-up to get it just right.
But WAIT! It's just TYPICAL, isn't it?... the valve is lurking behind the seat-stay or chain-stay! We've all been there, right?

The answer? It's here! The QuadValve® 4-valve inner tube® (only compatible with QuadValve® rims, of course).

Insist on QuadValve® - It's the future.

They're balanced too. So you get smoother power delivery compared to cheap unbalanced univalve systems.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom