Another post said the rider. He is correct, because IMO there are too many luddite cyclist wed to the 1890 DF so called safety bike. They wont admit there are other types of frames and number of wheels that better serve many cyclist. Time does march on.
Recumbants and tricycles are not a new invention.
Some of us have tried and failed miserably with three wheels.
Recumbents can be more difficult to store with the wider seat. Rotate the bars and drop the pedals off a DF and it's a very slim package indeed.
DF bikes are cheaper. And, IMHO good enough. Yes 'bents are lovely and comfortable in what limited experience I have with them (I had a Brox quadricycle - which was amazing for its utility much more than anything else) but these types of posts (luddite - really?) might not have the effect you think they have.
You ride a recumbent and you seem very happy with that. There's absolutely no need to call people who ride conventional bikes luddites.
The main thing that puts people off cycling isn't the bikes - it's traffic, badly behaved motorists (also people), the perception that cycles/HPVs are toys and that people who ride them for transport, or even dare I say as part of a group wearing lycra are deviants.