I don't quite understand that?
The shape of the gaps between the teeth should be the same everywhere on the cassette. The gaps on the big sprocket look fairly unworn, nice smooth curves. The gaps on the smaller sprockets look elongated - worn.
I've measured the chain, in metric it's 24.6cm for ten links so ready to change but shouldn't have destroyed the cassette.
Then it has 'anti-worn' - it has shrunk!
(One pair of links should be an inch, or 2.54 cm so 10 pairs of links on a new chain should be 25.4 cm. Did you mean 2
5.6 cm?)
2 mm is actually a fair amount of wear over 10 pairs of links and it is hard to be precise in measuring to the nearest mm. it could even be a tad more than that.
The chain should have been replaced by now. It is just a question of how much it has worn the cassette. Sometimes new chains slip on cassettes that don't even look particularly worn, but I think from those 2 photos that your cassette
does look worn. It would be easier to tell if I was looking at in real life in good light with my glasses on. I have just had to replace a cassette on one of my bikes because the chain started slipping, and it didn't look more worn than yours.
Anyway, as I said above - I reckon you have already passed the point of no return so you might as well carry on until you get a slipping chain and then replace everything.
NB A slipping chain could be nasty if you were standing out of the saddle and making a hard effort at the time so I would be careful climbing steep hills or sprinting. If you remain seated, then it is more annoying than dangerous.