ColinJ
Puzzle game procrastinator!
- Location
- Todmorden - Yorks/Lancs border
I have recently fitted a Hollowtech BB and chainset to my DIY 1x6 bike. The reason for doing it was that the left crank is, or should I say WAS a power meter crank. I bought the crank on eBay, advertised as non-functional, hoping to bring it back to life with some TLC, as I have done in the past with other eBay bargains such as my phone (the problem with that was just fluff clogging the microphone grille!)...
I spent some time today trying to revive the power meter but unfortunately it is currently emulating a Norwegian Blue! Oh well, at least I now have a nice Dura Ace BB, 105 cranks, and a new chainring.
Speaking of the chainring... I usually do my local smaller climbs in a 42/15 gear. That is quite tough, but makes short rides more challenging which suits me. On last night's test ride the bike felt pretty good on those climbs. I was surprised how much easier the climbs were. Then I remembered that the new chainring is a 39 not a 42, so I was using ~7% lower gear ratio! I need to use 39/14 gear to be roughly equal to what I was riding before. I will do that this evening and see how the bike performs.
The bike has been making a few noises so I took a look at it this afternoon. I found that a locknut on the rear hub was loose, which probably didn't help. I tightened it. Or should I say overtightened it! I found that the bearings had started to rumble due to lateral pressure. I slackened the locknut off a smidge, which sorted that out.
While the wheel was out, I tightened the cassette lock ring. It wasn't exactly loose, but it didn't take gorilla strength to get a couple of clicks worth of extra lockring rotation.
I checked the chain for wear. I haven't done a huge distance on it but overgeared climbing on that bike does seem to accelerate wear on my ageing body. And the bike transmission! Oops, 0.75%! I don’t want to prematurely wear my new chainring so I put a new chain on. I have always sized chains by 'big-to-big plus a pair of links' so I did that again. Too short! I hadn't factored in that it is a 1x transmission. The technique mentioned is to ensure safety if a rider accidentally selects biggest ring and biggest sprocket, not to make that combination good to ride. The rear mech was horribly extended. On a 1x all gear ratios should work cleanly. I had to patch a length of the discarded bit of chain back in! Yes, that means 2 quick links in the chain. No, I don't believe that to be a problem - I don’t remember ever having a QL fail. For the 1x, big-to-big plus 3 pairs of links seems about right.
Enough waffling... I am going out now to do another of my lumpy local loops to test the bike. [*** SELF-JINXING WARNING!!! ***] Which will no doubt result in one of those non-problematic QLs failing!
I spent some time today trying to revive the power meter but unfortunately it is currently emulating a Norwegian Blue! Oh well, at least I now have a nice Dura Ace BB, 105 cranks, and a new chainring.
Speaking of the chainring... I usually do my local smaller climbs in a 42/15 gear. That is quite tough, but makes short rides more challenging which suits me. On last night's test ride the bike felt pretty good on those climbs. I was surprised how much easier the climbs were. Then I remembered that the new chainring is a 39 not a 42, so I was using ~7% lower gear ratio! I need to use 39/14 gear to be roughly equal to what I was riding before. I will do that this evening and see how the bike performs.
The bike has been making a few noises so I took a look at it this afternoon. I found that a locknut on the rear hub was loose, which probably didn't help. I tightened it. Or should I say overtightened it! I found that the bearings had started to rumble due to lateral pressure. I slackened the locknut off a smidge, which sorted that out.
While the wheel was out, I tightened the cassette lock ring. It wasn't exactly loose, but it didn't take gorilla strength to get a couple of clicks worth of extra lockring rotation.
I checked the chain for wear. I haven't done a huge distance on it but overgeared climbing on that bike does seem to accelerate wear on my ageing body. And the bike transmission! Oops, 0.75%! I don’t want to prematurely wear my new chainring so I put a new chain on. I have always sized chains by 'big-to-big plus a pair of links' so I did that again. Too short! I hadn't factored in that it is a 1x transmission. The technique mentioned is to ensure safety if a rider accidentally selects biggest ring and biggest sprocket, not to make that combination good to ride. The rear mech was horribly extended. On a 1x all gear ratios should work cleanly. I had to patch a length of the discarded bit of chain back in! Yes, that means 2 quick links in the chain. No, I don't believe that to be a problem - I don’t remember ever having a QL fail. For the 1x, big-to-big plus 3 pairs of links seems about right.
Enough waffling... I am going out now to do another of my lumpy local loops to test the bike. [*** SELF-JINXING WARNING!!! ***] Which will no doubt result in one of those non-problematic QLs failing!