maybe and maybe not, when I first got interested in bikes again I found so much confusing but at least I understood the term hybrid. It's all the additional info that causes the confusion, from bike specific terminology to the wide variety of opinion on what's good for what, and I count bike shops as adding to this confusion as well.
I'd have to agree with that – the term
hybrid seems to be used to encompass everything between a mountain bike and a road bike. When I started looking for a more road-oriented bike a few months ago, I was more and more bamboozled every time I went into a cycle shop. Options are good, yes, but I too experienced a wide variety of opinion (often completely opposing opinions too) on what bike was good for what, and what bike was right for me.
I just knew that I wanted something less geared (literally) for climbing mountains, and more appropriate for where I cycled – cycle paths and roads. I couldn't afford a Specialized Tricross (which was recommended on numerous occasions), didn't like the cheap feel of the front-sus 'hybrid' I tried (Scott) compared to my old Trek 6500 MTB, and I couldn't bring myself to buy an out-and-out road bike with drop bars. I had been experiencing heat and a little discomfort in my left shoulder blade riding my old Trek on the roads (possibly a little long in the reach?), and this was discouraging me from going for drops in case it got worse.
Having eventually bought what I thought was the best "commuting during the week and cycle paths with the kids at the weekend" solution, I still have no idea what kind of bike my Ridgeback Flight is. It's been suggested that it's a "flat bar road bike", and knowing what I know about bike componentry (not a lot) with its Sora derailleur, 12-25 cassette and 52-42-30 triple chain set who am I to argue? It may be less of a mouthful to just call it a hybrid, but I've decided to call it George