dragon72
Guru
- Location
- Mexico City
...but how reliable is its electronic transmission? Teehee.
...but how reliable is its electronic transmission? Teehee.
...but how reliable is its electronic transmission? Teehee.
Agreed. Form for function, built to do a job.I think it's a thing of beauty Function over form for some though.
I am a mechanical and aerospace engineer, so I'm kinky that way
Agreed. Form for function, built to do a job.
Whoever said the rear brake has a fairing is wrong, the whole structure of the caliper is built aerodynamically. UCI regs forbid fairings simply for wind smoothing, but allow structural parts to be shaped within regulation limits.
1.3.024
The addition of a cover to a braking system, as shown in the image below, is authorised. The unit is considered to be integrated with the frame or fork.
The combination of the frame tube (or fork tube) + brake + cover must respect the 1:3 rule, as well as the minimum and maximum dimension rules and must be contained completely within the corresponding 8 cm box.
No O rings on his one?
I'd need a stepladder to get anywhere near that saddle. And someone to steer for me as I wouldn't be able to reach the bars.
Just seen this on Cycling Weekly's web site. The quote from the Lion King movie 'uggglyyyyyyyyy..." sprang to mind :-)
What do others think?
The commentators yesterday said that he was riding the Graal.Did he actually use this in the TTT? Commentators were saying the UCI had a problem with it so they had to make a last minute bike swap?