UCI reveals world series

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Looks like the latter, 10 races as follows:

The Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a Espana would be part of the project alongside one-day races Milan-San Remo, Tour of Flanders, Paris-Roubaix, Amstel Gold Cup, Liege-Bastogne-Liege and Tour of Lombardy, with a points system to award the leading rider and team at the end of the season.
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Mmmm, you're right, it is a bit contradictory, isn't it? Grand tours as part of the project seems clear. I simply miscounted and, thinking there were 7 other races thought ''there's my ten.'' Not the best at maths as there are only 6 listed!

EDIT: this seems clearer
 

oldroadman

Veteran
Location
Ubique
I think a bit of misreading has happened. The UCI have not announced anything. World Series Cycling (or something like that) is a Luxembourg based private company who want the "own" series, but have s far only admitted to 8 teams. The 4 day races (10 of them) they are projecting are additional to the calendar. They say they will talk to UCI. No sign of where the money or calendar space is. Don't hold your breath. Almost as credible as the Skins driven "campaign", plenty of PR but no real outcomes so far.
 

oldroadman

Veteran
Location
Ubique
Richard wonders if a global world cycling series will benefit the sport

http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/0,,16299_8429178,00.html
How about no? It looks like a simple money making idea, with not enough teams, no programme slots, and i can't think of a more dull package than 10 races each of 4 days in the same format. Run by a business that fails to respect the sport's monuments, and shows a lack of basic research and understanding.
Hopefully it will simply go away.
 

Lee_M

Guru
Nightmare. If that goes ahead then only sky sports package satellite subscribers will get to see the races. I hate monopolys like that.

why else would they sponsor it?

Whatever else you say about Sky they have put more money into cycling in the last few years than anyone else.
How much coverage did it used to get by anyone else.

Personally I see the BBC as bandwagon jumpers - totally disinterested until someone else has made the investment and done all the hard work
 

thom

____
Location
The Borough
Personally I see the BBC as bandwagon jumpers - totally disinterested until someone else has made the investment and done all the hard work
Do you think the BBC should be sponsoring UK track cycling and a pro-cycling team ?

I agree the BBC completely jump on the bandwagon but they're a public service broadcaster within the UK, not a global corporation seeking advertising space.
 
Location
Alberta
Sky may have put £ into cycling in the UK, true, but it is really just paid advertising, look at the GB team, you are hard pressed to find the nation they reperesent behind all the Sky logos. Fairly soon the TdF will only be seen on Sky in the UK, which will more than return their investment. It's a business, nothing else. Subscribe to Sky sports ? Jamais. Dont like to be painted into a corner.
 
Top Bottom