TV Licensing - Bloody Cheek!!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
Davidc said:
The digital signal you get before switch over is irrelevant. The service after switchover has a power designed to give at least the same service area as the analogue service it replaces. Generaly the transmitter power is set to give better coverage.

It's not irrelevent, more a kind of guide and for a long time wolfbane weren't even working on topography for after switchover, which I think was a great pity. As DTT already covers a large part of the population with a very large minority (<25%) not getting it it would be seen as a fairly good guide if you're in the 75% and not faffing around with an indoor aerial. You point about optimisation is also rather naughty, it'll still cause a bit of repointing of aerials and thinking about what services people want.

Davidc said:
If your transmitter is one which carries the pre changeover freeview service (even if it's too weak for you to receive) you will get the full set of digital channels. If your transmitter has no pre changeover digital service you will get a reduced public service only set of channels, which still includes 6 BBC, 4 ITV, Channel 4 and some of its extras, Five and some of its extras, and several more.

Ish. It depends where you point the aerial. It's where I think your previous post was a bit naughty as you know very well that a small number, potentially fairly large will have to repoint the aerial back towards primary. Out of date info now though with the mux migration with an intermediate proportion able to get migrated stuff.

Davidc said:
It is still a common misconception that there is a relationship between reception of the temporary very low power digital TV service that's been on the air since about 1998, latterly as Freeview, and the new all digital TV service we're all changing over to. There isn't. The new service will have over 99.8% population coverage (as did analogue), will use high power channels*, and in almost all cases will give better reception on existing aerials than does the analogue service.

It's not a misconception in the sense people could quite literally be quoting facts. DTT only covers about 75% of the country at the moment. You're also being a bit naughty on the bit I highlighted, you mean proper existing rooftop aerials.
 

Davidc

Guru
Location
Somerset UK
marinyork said:
It's not irrelevent, more a kind of guide and for a long time wolfbane weren't even working on topography for after switchover, which I think was a great pity. The broadcasters have been since the thing was first planned. As DTT already covers a large part of the population with a very large minority (<25%) not getting it it would be seen as a fairly good guide if you're in the 75% and not faffing around with an indoor aerial. As I said, what goes for the pre switchover digital service is largely irrelevant. If you get the pre switchover digital service I can't think of any way you could lose it though, although the actual channels will change. You point about optimisation is also rather naughty, it'll still cause a bit of repointing of aerials and thinking about what services people want. People will get either the basic or enhanced service, which will always include a lot more than the 4 or 5 analogue ones they get pre switchover. No (absolutely no) repointing of aerials needed anywhere.



Ish. It depends where you point the aerial. It'll pick up whichever transmitter it's picking up now. All will be digital.It's where I think your previous post was a bit naughty as you know very well that a small number, potentially fairly large will have to repoint the aerial back towards primary. No they won't. All exixsting analogue transmitters will carry digital. Out of date info now though with the mux migration with an intermediate proportion able to get migrated stuff.

It's not a misconception in the sense people could quite literally be quoting facts. DTT only covers about 75% of the country at the moment. You're also being a bit naughty on the bit I highlighted, you mean proper existing rooftop aerials.
They can't know the facts from experience unless they are in the South West or Whitehaven, where there have been very few problems.

D
 

Crankarm

Guru
Location
Nr Cambridge
Problem with deciding to give up on TV and therefore receiving broadcasts is that I will no longer be able to listen to digital radio though the set top box supplying the TV and also connected to my amp and speakers which gives pretty good sound. Could get rid of the TV but to watch DVDs and videos the TV is needed so would constantly be taking it in and out of it's box and disconnecting connecting the aerial :biggrin:.

Inevitably my TV reception set up will have to be dismantled in part or full so they can't pin "he might have been tempted to take a peak at Big Brother....." on me.
 

CopperBrompton

Bicycle: a means of transport between cake-stops
Location
London
After getting fed up with these threatening letters, I sent them a recorded delivery letter threatening legal action for harrassment if I received any more. Haven't had one since then (several years ago now).
 

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
Davidc said:

You haven't a clue what you're talking about, although clearly well meaning.

Crankarm said:
Problem with deciding to give up on TV and therefore receiving broadcasts is that I will no longer be able to listen to digital radio though the set top box supplying the TV and also connected to my amp and speakers which gives pretty good sound. Could get rid of the TV but to watch DVDs and videos the TV is needed so would constantly be taking it in and out of it's box and disconnecting connecting the aerial :biggrin:.

Inevitably my TV reception set up will have to be dismantled in part or full so they can't pin "he might have been tempted to take a peak at Big Brother....." on me.

Take a cable run out.

It's a shame about the tv set up, dab? Not good I know.
 

Davidc

Guru
Location
Somerset UK
marinyork said:
You haven't a clue what you're talking about, although clearly well meaning.



Take a cable run out.

It's a shame about the tv set up, dab? Not good I know.

It would be interesting to know how the courts would interpret having a satellite receiver or DVBT (eg Freeview) recceiver used only for radio, but with a TV of some sot to see the EPG, purely for tuning.

I have one box which contans a DAB radio and DVBT receiver, with a LCD display just adequate for standalone use. How would that be considered? A barister could make a good fee there I'm sure.

I've given a view on DAB elsewhere - I used to have to work with it (OK...) and help promote it (AAAAAAARGH). We all have our price. If we're going to have digital radio can we please have DAB+ which (I've read) actually works in cars and has listenable sound quality.
 

Davidc

Guru
Location
Somerset UK
Ben Lovejoy said:
After getting fed up with these threatening letters, I sent them a recorded delivery letter threatening legal action for harrassment if I received any more. Haven't had one since then (several years ago now).

A blind friend of mine did that as well and never had any more problems.
 

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
Davidc said:
It would be interesting to know how the courts would interpret having a satellite receiver or DVBT (eg Freeview) recceiver used only for radio, but with a TV of some sot to see the EPG, purely for tuning.

Could tune it on a neighbours, so that could be a solution. I think the problem would be that there would be a tv elsewhere in the house though :biggrin:. If there wasn't I think it'd be a viable solution.

Davidc said:
I've given a view on DAB elsewhere - I used to have to work with it (OK...) and help promote it (AAAAAAARGH). We all have our price. If we're going to have digital radio can we please have DAB+ which (I've read) actually works in cars and has listenable sound quality.

That's fine, I'm not a radio person, I just know how coding theory works. I'd have thought something along thoselines might work for crankarm. Costs money but when you're saving getting onfor £150 a year...

Just a point on the repointing, you really are wrong on that. I hope it's not a large group as there was enough of a fuss kicked up with out of group channels (frequencies) and power requirements what they could/couldn't get last time.
 

swee'pea99

Squire
Blimey what a thread! Dare I say that I think the license fee is excellent value for money. On Monday night, eg, I watched University Challenge, The Street and The Wire. I think that's not bad for 39p.
 

worcester dan

Senior Member
^^^This^^
9 Tv channels at least 9 national Radio stations( plus countless regional ones) the best website in the world
good value in my mind

way better value than Mr Murdock
 

Davidc

Guru
Location
Somerset UK
marinyork said:
It's not irrelevent, more a kind of guide and for a long time wolfbane weren't even working on topography for after switchover, which I think was a great pity. As DTT already covers a large part of the population with a very large minority (<25%) not getting it it would be seen as a fairly good guide if you're in the 75% and not faffing around with an indoor aerial. You point about optimisation is also rather naughty, it'll still cause a bit of repointing of aerials and thinking about what services people want.



Ish. It depends where you point the aerial. It's where I think your previous post was a bit naughty as you know very well that a small number, potentially fairly large will have to repoint the aerial back towards primary. Out of date info now though with the mux migration with an intermediate proportion able to get migrated stuff.



It's not a misconception in the sense people could quite literally be quoting facts. DTT only covers about 75% of the country at the moment. You're also being a bit naughty on the bit I highlighted, you mean proper existing rooftop aerials.

I missed a bit earlier (in a hurry). Basically yes, since indoor aerials don't work well for analogue.

Indoor and set top aerials will work - but as with analogue the results are unpredictable. I don't like anecdotal evidence, but in this case it's all I have.

In Cheam, SW London, in a flat from which you can see the Crystal Palace mast at about 10 miles, an indoor aerial is useless for analogue. Works quite well for the existing digital (just don't walk in front of it). The 40 year old communal aerial in the roof space is however best, with perfect reception of digital.

Near Penzance, in a sheltered flat where reception is from a small repeater, a 96 year old relative of mine and 98 year old husband had to change. I had 3 phone calls. One was when an aerial contractor tried to persuade all of the occupants they had to have a new aerial system. On my recommendation trading standards were asked to investigate, and are as far as I know still doing so. Beware the con men will try to use this oportunity to get you.

The next call was to confirm that they needed one of the boxes with a RF output. Answer yes. Their set was one with two knobs. One with numbers 1 to 9 and a U on it, and VHF written underneath. The other with 21 to 68 written on it, continuous tuning, and UHF written under it. (It is a colour set). Those old enough to have been around in the 60s and early 70s will recognise this as a dual standard 405/625 set! It had a reconditioned tube in 1977.

A couple of days after Redruth and its repeaters switched I had the third call, to say it all worked OK, including the video recorder (connected as instructed) and what was all the fuss about?

Other relatives (in their 80s in south Devon) just bought the box, plugged it in a few years ago for Freeview. They followed the instructions, no problems. They also said that they didn't know anyone who had had any difficulties.

Friends who watch the Croyde Bay repeater (no pre switchover digital there!) from outside its coverage area had no problems and for the first time ever now get a good TV service - officially they are unserved by terrestrial TV and because of the topography can't get satellite either. (I bet TV licencing would still have 'em if they didn't buy a licence).

The other anecdote is from here. We receive the West service which changes next year, and can get the existing analogue and digital, provided the trees in front of the house aren't moving. To deal with the tree problem I have in the past tried to get analogue from Stockland Hill (West region and we're out of its service area). I couldn't, even on a high performance outdoor aerial. Pictures were always noisy with ghosting caused by nearby houses. I gave up, put up a dish and scrounged an old sky box to get the Freesat from Sky service for the main TV.

Stockland Hill switched last month. We can now receive digital services from it, downstairs on an indoor aerial. Just don't walk across the room.

While anecdotal all except the first example are typical experiences of the real world after the switchover. No new aerials needed, better reception than before. No problems whatever.

There was nothing in my original post which was 'naughty', it's just 100% accurate.

The new full digital service just replaces the now obsolete analogue service. Same transmitter sites, same or better coverage, same aerial groups (there might be some low power relays where that's not quite true but noone's likely to notice). All anyone neds to do is plug in the box, switch it on, and tell it to scan twice. Once when BBC2 analogue gets switched off, and again when the rest of the analogue service gets switched off. Thats it - done. Even a 98 year old can manage it.

Satellite changed from Analogue to Digital some years ago. This is simpler.
 

Dan B

Disengaged member
[quote name='swee'pea99']Blimey what a thread! Dare I say that I think the license fee is excellent value for money[/quote]
I might almost be minded to agree with you, but I refuse to reward the bullying tactics of the BBC's collections sharks (a.k.a the so-called TVLA) by giving in and buying one. When they stop assuming that everyone in the country without a license is a criminal, then I will think about watching (and paying for) broadcast TV again, but until then I'll make do with iplayer.
 

swee'pea99

Squire
threebikesmcginty said:
Corror-horror is on ITV and doesn't count! :smile:
I would rather stick needles in my eyes...

The Street is a fine drama series co-written/produced by Jimmy McGovern.
 
OP
OP
threebikesmcginty

threebikesmcginty

Corn Fed Hick...
Location
...on the slake
[quote name='swee'pea99']I would rather stick needles in my eyes...

The Street is a fine drama series co-written/produced by Jimmy McGovern.[/quote]


oops!! show's how much I watch - never heard of it :smile:
 
Top Bottom