Dogtrousers
Kilometre nibbler
I have an inflatable Chris Boardman. Doesn't everyone?Did you get a pass for the commentary box or were you round Boardman's gaffe?
I have an inflatable Chris Boardman. Doesn't everyone?Did you get a pass for the commentary box or were you round Boardman's gaffe?
Even my kids have watched bits and tried to pick up some of the terminology .... I was asked today "what happened last night in the Kevin?"Talk about something other than cycling? I don't understand...
BMX seeding runs from 17:30, Vuelta team presentations tomorrow night, BMX finals Friday, XC Sat/Sun and then the Vuelta highlights are on itv4 every evening anywayAny ideas as to what I can do tonight? Diary looks a little empty.
Top autocorrecting, Kevin!Anyone see the Telegraph article on the Kevin last night
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/olympics...-analysts-helped-jason-kenny-during-farcical/
So according to team GB, no one infringed the Durney.
Yes, it occurred to me that the camera should be on the derny itself, presumably pointing outwards in line with the rear end. That way, it'll be where the derny happens to be.At a defined point where the derny is deemed to be off, irrespective of whether or not it has.
TMN to me.... I said that yesterday!Yes, it occurred to me that the camera should be on the derny itself, presumably pointing outwards in line with the rear end. That way, it'll be where the derny happens to be.
It was certainly the best outcome, but it looked as though the rule had a bit of ambiguity in it, in the first place.I quite enjoyed the way it was policed yesterday, once it was all over.
Apologies, I appear to have missed your post.TMN to me.... I said that yesterday!
It was certainly the best outcome, but it looked as though the rule had a bit of ambiguity in it, in the first place.
I must admit that I'd not seen it before. However, the fact that Eilers saw fit to exploit the ambiguity in the restart makes me think that competitors will do it again in the same way. Mind, I reckon dernys should go faster than that at that point.The fact that they were able to achieve the best outcome suggests that it may not be that important to change the rule. Sometimes, ambiguity may be a positive attribute.
I'd only be worried about the rules being faulty if situations like last night were a common occurrence, but apparently they're not.