robgul
Legendary Member
Thanks for the very balanced post ... to answer your last point first:
We have been amazed by the response since TCC was announced just 7 days ago - there will be a brief update published at the end of today, Friday 19 February 2016 that will also contain the comments that were made in the "I'm interested" responses (it's a long list!)
The initial launch was deliberately very open in terms of detail and what TCC was likely to be about because we wanted those with an interest to tell us what they thought and would like to see - rather than a prescriptive "This is what you'll get" . . . which is perhaps the root of the reasoning for the initiative.
You mention needing to "read between the lines" ...... most people that have responded did do so - being aware of the ongoing discussions on the CTC Forum (stemming back quite a few years) and the Facebook page (Where should CTC be going?) established over a year ago ... we gave the link to that page. For us to have come out with the TCC idea based on "CTC's going down the pan, here's a better model" would have not been right or in the spirit of what's envisaged, nor did we want to engage in virulent discussion with lots of pointless Forum posts.
We hope that what we have done so far and the obvious traction the project has from the interest to date goes forward.
.... and to cyclists with an interest in touring please do add your voice to the TCC - through the "I'm interested" or (as from today) the "MY ideas" forms - and join the Forum as well.
Rob (and Dennis)
We have been amazed by the response since TCC was announced just 7 days ago - there will be a brief update published at the end of today, Friday 19 February 2016 that will also contain the comments that were made in the "I'm interested" responses (it's a long list!)
The initial launch was deliberately very open in terms of detail and what TCC was likely to be about because we wanted those with an interest to tell us what they thought and would like to see - rather than a prescriptive "This is what you'll get" . . . which is perhaps the root of the reasoning for the initiative.
You mention needing to "read between the lines" ...... most people that have responded did do so - being aware of the ongoing discussions on the CTC Forum (stemming back quite a few years) and the Facebook page (Where should CTC be going?) established over a year ago ... we gave the link to that page. For us to have come out with the TCC idea based on "CTC's going down the pan, here's a better model" would have not been right or in the spirit of what's envisaged, nor did we want to engage in virulent discussion with lots of pointless Forum posts.
We hope that what we have done so far and the obvious traction the project has from the interest to date goes forward.
.... and to cyclists with an interest in touring please do add your voice to the TCC - through the "I'm interested" or (as from today) the "MY ideas" forms - and join the Forum as well.
Rob (and Dennis)