And that he's wily too. Sagan, I think it was, wanted Greipel as a windbreak too but Cav nicked it.I thought it helped slightly that the finish was on a slight bend and Cav was on the inside.
2, no?
3 separate positives for cocaine!
He's still got the speed - no way could someone beat Greipel, who is at the top of his game, without speed, but this time he got the timing right. Cav is still in the top three pure sprinters and could go on for years picking up wins like that. Time to get rid of the train though - just keep Rensh to look after him in the last part of the stage, and then let him get on with it by using other people's wheels as he knows how to do so well. Yesterday's win made me think of Robbie McEwan.He may not have the pure speed any more but he still has the killer instinct
Put it like this - if he's lacking "pure speed" then how come he ends up in the top four of the sprinter's stages? There's plenty of "fast men" in the peloton would love to have his finishing speed. The top end does fade a little as sprinters get older - this is compensated for with experience, pride, outright cunning, and determination. Cav has a few more years of battering people yet, and as noted, does look a little lighter, so the slight rising finishers will suit him very nicely. 30 stage wins in the TdF alone is possible with 26 in the bag so far. In my view he has nothing to prove. I recall a silly reporter posing some question about proving himself, the straight faced reply "25 stages and a world championship, I don't need to prove anything". Lucky reporter, a few years ago he would have been in serious danger of a much more robust response! Right, off out for a little potter and "sprint" (ahem..) for a few village signs - so long as they are not uphill!That was evident today. Plus he got the timing right.
He may not have the pure speed any more but he still has the killer instinct. Needs a few of attempts to get it right though, which is always going to hamper any green jersey ambitions.
Yep it's a weird way of reporting. I was chatting to my FiL today (a Daily Fail reader) and he was like "Cav did well considering he's past it". "What makes you think he's past it?", "Well he's not won anything for 2 years". "Errm, no he's not won a TdF stage for 2 years and that's because he won one of the last available to him in 2013 and missed out on 2014"Too many people quick to write people off too quickly. Just because others have gotten to a level to match or beat cav doesn't mean cav is sh1t or past it. It's two years as he crashed out on first stage last year, just an easy way to try and make someone look shoot unfairly.
Put it like this - if he's lacking "pure speed" then how come he ends up in the top four of the sprinter's stages?