Tour de France 2012 (with SPOILERS)

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Nice analogy and very accurate. That said, there is a lot of knowledge on there and the thread on climbing speeds is fascinating.
Yep, that one, I'm paying a bit more credence too but it also requires me to read and understand more, so I need to read it a few times to understand it all.
 

smutchin

Cat 6 Racer
Location
The Red Enclave
They're wearing me down with their drip-drip-drip innuendo...

I mean, I know* Sky aren't doping but I keep reading so many vaguely plausible "proofs" of why they must be doping that I'm starting to get confused...

Should I just change my name to Winston Smith?

d.

*know/trust
 

PpPete

Legendary Member
Location
Chandler's Ford
OK - so here's a question for all you more knowledgeable folks out there ....
Given that his priority is "last man standing" in the Sky train for Wiggo, what are Chris Froome's chances of holding on to the KOM jersey ?
 

smutchin

Cat 6 Racer
Location
The Red Enclave
It won't happen.

That was the first big climb, plus it was double points for being the finish of the stage, so whoever won the stage was guaranteed to take the jersey. (The points have been weighted this year so it's impossible to win the jersey by bagging all the 3rd and 4th cat climbs.)

Froome may possibly win another mountaintop stage finish like that but he won't be contesting the intermediate climbs on the big Alpine/Pyrenean stages, which are where the jersey will be won.

d.
 
They're wearing me down with their drip-drip-drip innuendo...

I mean, I know* Sky aren't doping but I keep reading so many vaguely plausible "proofs" of why they must be doping that I'm starting to get confused...

Should I just change my name to Winston Smith?

d.

*know/trust
Quit the outraged innuendo reading and read this http://www.sportsscientists.com/2009/07/tour-de-france-2009-power-estimates.html followed by some of the more lucid posts on here http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=8839&page=79 and see if what Sky are doing is believable.

And when you find out, let me know because I still have to read some bits slowly and out loud. The gist is, they are but they must be at the limit. Comparisons to Lemond's days have to be read carefully, as I'm pretty sure the whole approach and understanding of training and limits, phyiology and endocrinology, has changed since then, as has the style of racing.
 
To be fair to Brad, I don't think he 'stood his ground' as Eurosport have it. He would have had to pull a fairly decent move to avoid being hit, and I think it's understandable at the end of a day like yesterday that people are a bit pissed off with the hundreds of journalists and cameramen running around without much concern for the riders.

As for his language, well, that's pretty normal for a Londoner...

As for the Remmings/others spat, well, at least we have some handbags, even if they're not from Cav and Brad!

FWIW, and for fear of incurring remmo's wrath, I don't get the argument that Sky are somehow deficient as regards Cav.

Winning the Olympic Road Race isn't going to be about having an HTC-style lead out, it's more like a Classics race, and what you need is a team to pull you to the end of the race and to dump you at the end near the front. From then on it's up to Cav to win...

For Sky the TdF is only about Wiggo, if Cav can win a few stages, then that's a bonus...

Fair comments Zimzum, slightly more detail and reasoning behind what you're saying here and though I don't agree, I can appreciate your standpoint.

On a much more positive note, Sky were incredible today from the point at which they began to turn the screw on the rest of the peloton. How steep was that gradient FFS?
 

Scoosh

Velocouchiste
Moderator
Location
Edinburgh
Quit the outraged innuendo reading and read this http://www.sportsscientists.com/2009/07/tour-de-france-2009-power-estimates.html followed by some of the more lucid posts on here http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=8839&page=79 and see if what Sky are doing is believable.

And when you find out, let me know because I still have to read some bits slowly and out loud. The gist is, they are but they must be at the limit. Comparisons to Lemond's days have to be read carefully, as I'm pretty sure the whole approach and understanding of training and limits, phyiology and endocrinology, has changed since then, as has the style of racing.
Without having read any of the above links (yet :smile:) , my thought is that
  1. SKY have done their homework and recces on the stage(s) and
  2. with their performance-based data, know how much power their riders are capable of sustaining over what period and so they get them to ride to their limits, then pull off (lead-out guys), leaving the way 'clear' for their finishers (Froome and Wiggins). It's all power-meter based, so they are good at a steady pace but can't do the accelerate - rest - accelerate people like (dirty :ohmy: ) Bertie can.
Various commentators much more knowledgeable than I reckon this to be the case too (the bit about the accelerate-rest-accelerate).
 
On a much more positive note, Sky were incredible today from the point at which they began to turn the screw on the rest of the peloton. How steep was that gradient FFS?
About 20% on the final pitch.
 

2pies

Veteran
Location
Brighton
Proud to be British today. Cav has been flying the flag for a few years, but he seemed to be an isolated talent surrounded by foreigners, kind of a like an african or asian footballer would be at Man Utd. or Chelsea.

Today, British cycling turned up trumps. Lead the way for the best part of the day, grabbed the stage win and the yellow jersey. Can it get much better than that for a nation with such a limited cycling pedigree?

How steep was that gradient FFS?

The speed at which Froome went up that last stretch was frightening. They say it was 20%. I've ridden up White Down in Surrey which has a turn that is the same, its absolutely brutal.
 
Top Bottom